Obaid Daniel, Hailan Ahmed, Chase Alexander, Dorman Stephen, Jenkins Geraint, Raybould Adrian, Ramsey Mark, Thomas Phillip, Smith David, Ionescu Adrian
Morriston Cardiac Centre, Swansea SA6 6NL, United Kingdom.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2017 Jul;29(7):219-224.
This prospective study assesses balloon-assisted tracking (BAT) in reducing radial access failure during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Arterial spasm prevents PCI from the radial artery in a small percentage of cases.
A total of 2223 consecutive patients undergoing PCI from the radial approach were analyzed. Radial access failure mode and requirement for crossover to femoral access during a 12-month run-in period were compared with the following 14-month period with routine BAT usage.
During the 14-month study period, 1334 radial PCIs were attempted. Twenty-six patients switched to femoral at an early stage, while 76 encountered radial spasm and underwent successful BAT in 69 cases (91%), giving a total crossover rate to femoral of 33/1334 (2.5%). Utilizing BAT rather than a femoral puncture reduced our institution's radial-femoral crossover rate from 7.6% to 2.5% (P<.01), which is also significantly lower than the radial-femoral crossover rate in the 12 months before BAT implementation (6.1%; P<.01). Mean procedure times were similar for those requiring BAT compared with conventional radial access (51.3 ± 21.3 min vs 47.9 ± 23.7 min; P=.23), and those crossing straight to femoral (BAT not attempted) (60.7 ± 31.9 min; P=.10). Mean first device/balloon time for the BAT-assisted primary PCI cases (22.6 ± 9.4 min) was similar to cases that had radial difficulties and converted to femoral without attempting BAT (25.8 ± 13.4 min; P=.54).
BAT allowed catheter passage despite radial spasm in 91% of cases, significantly reducing the institution's rate of femoral crossover. During radial spasm in primary PCI, using BAT did not delay reperfusion compared with femoral crossover.
本前瞻性研究评估球囊辅助跟踪(BAT)在减少经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间桡动脉穿刺失败方面的效果。
在少数情况下,动脉痉挛会妨碍经桡动脉进行PCI。
对总共2223例连续经桡动脉途径接受PCI的患者进行分析。将12个月导入期内的桡动脉穿刺失败模式及转为股动脉穿刺的需求,与随后14个月常规使用BAT期间进行比较。
在14个月的研究期间,共尝试进行1334例桡动脉PCI。26例患者在早期转为股动脉穿刺,76例出现桡动脉痉挛,其中69例(91%)成功进行了BAT,总的转为股动脉穿刺率为33/1334(2.5%)。使用BAT而非股动脉穿刺使本机构的桡动脉-股动脉转换率从7.6%降至2.5%(P<0.01),这也显著低于实施BAT前12个月的桡动脉-股动脉转换率(6.1%;P<0.01)。与传统桡动脉穿刺相比,需要BAT的患者平均手术时间相似(51.3±21.3分钟对47.9±23.7分钟;P=0.23),直接转为股动脉穿刺(未尝试BAT)的患者平均手术时间为(60.7±31.9分钟;P=0.10)。BAT辅助的直接PCI病例的平均首次使用器械/球囊时间(22.6±9.4分钟)与出现桡动脉困难且未尝试BAT而转为股动脉穿刺的病例相似((25.8±13.4分钟;P=0.54)。
BAT使91%的病例在存在桡动脉痉挛的情况下仍能顺利通过导管,显著降低了本机构的股动脉转换率。在直接PCI过程中出现桡动脉痉挛时,与转为股动脉穿刺相比,使用BAT并未延迟再灌注。