• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Data exclusivity exceptions and compulsory licensing to promote generic medicines in the European Union: .欧盟促进仿制药发展的数据独占权例外与强制许可:
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017 Jun 28;10:19. doi: 10.1186/s40545-017-0107-9. eCollection 2017.
2
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Flexibilities and Public Health: Implementation of Compulsory Licensing Provisions into National Patent Legislation.与贸易有关的知识产权方面的灵活性和公共卫生:将强制许可条款纳入国家专利立法。
Milbank Q. 2023 Dec;101(4):1280-1303. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12669. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
3
The role of intellectual property rights on access to medicines in the WHO African region: 25 years after the TRIPS agreement.知识产权在世界卫生组织非洲区域获得药品方面的作用:《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》通过 25 年后。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 11;21(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10374-y.
4
What is the impact of intellectual property rules on access to medicines? A systematic review.知识产权规则对药品可及性有何影响?一项系统综述。
Global Health. 2022 Apr 15;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00826-4.
5
Compulsory Licensing of Pharmaceuticals in High-Income Countries: A Comparative Analysis.高收入国家药品强制许可:比较分析。
Milbank Q. 2022 Mar;100(1):284-313. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12557. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
6
Medicine procurement and the use of flexibilities in the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 2001-2016.2001-2016 年,医药采购与《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》中的灵活性运用。
Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Mar 1;96(3):185-193. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.199364. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
7
Has the implementation of the TRIPS Agreement in Latin America and the Caribbean produced intellectual property legislation that favours public health?《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》(TRIPS协定)在拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的实施是否产生了有利于公共卫生的知识产权立法?
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Nov;82(11):815-21. Epub 2004 Dec 14.
8
A method for understanding generic procurement of HIV medicines by developing countries with patent protection.发展中国家在专利保护下理解通用采购艾滋病毒药物的方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Jul;185:118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 4.
9
TRIPS to Where? A Narrative Review of the Empirical Literature on Intellectual Property Licensing Models to Promote Global Diffusion of Essential Medicines.走向何方的贸易相关知识产权协定?关于促进基本药物全球传播的知识产权许可模式实证文献的叙述性综述
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Dec 27;14(1):48. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14010048.
10
Raising the Barriers to Access to Medicines in the Developing World - The Relentless Push for Data Exclusivity.提高发展中国家获取药品的壁垒——对数据独占权的不懈追求。
Dev World Bioeth. 2017 Apr;17(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12105. Epub 2016 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Perspectives and Update on the Global Shortage of Verteporfin (Visudyne).维替泊芬(Visudyne)全球短缺情况的观点与最新进展
Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Jul;13(7):1821-1831. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00952-9. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
Shaping the future of global access to safe, effective, appropriate and quality health products.塑造全球获取安全、有效、适宜和优质健康产品的未来。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Jan 9;9(1):e014425. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014425.
3
3D Printing, Intellectual Property Rights and Medical Emergencies: In Search of New Flexibilities.3D打印、知识产权与医疗紧急情况:寻求新的灵活性
IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law. 2022;53(8):1149-1173. doi: 10.1007/s40319-022-01235-1. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
4
Government Patent Use to Promote Public Health in the United States: Overcoming Nonpatent Exclusivities.美国政府利用专利促进公共卫生:克服非专利排他性
Am J Public Health. 2022 Aug;112(8):1110-1114. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306888. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
5
Clinical impact of the worldwide shortage of verteporfin (Visudyne®) on ophthalmic care.维替泊芬(Visudyne®)在全球范围内短缺对眼科护理的临床影响。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov;100(7):e1522-e1532. doi: 10.1111/aos.15148. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
6
Return of Benefit to Society of Publicly Funded Innovations to Combat COVID-19.抗击新冠疫情的公共资金创新成果回归社会带来的裨益。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211059734. doi: 10.1177/00469580211059734.
7
Overriding drug and medical technology patents for pandemic recovery: a legitimate move for high-income countries, too.为实现疫情后复苏而突破药品和医疗技术专利:这对高收入国家来说也是合理之举。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Apr;6(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005518.
8
Importance of the intellectual property system in attempting compulsory licensing of pharmaceuticals: a cross-sectional analysis.论知识产权制度在药品强制许可尝试中的重要性:一项横断面分析。
Global Health. 2019 Jun 27;15(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0485-7.
9
Does the political will exist to bring quality-assured and affordable drugs to low- and middle-income countries?是否存在将质量有保证且价格可承受的药品带给低收入和中等收入国家的政治意愿?
Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1586317. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2019.1586317.
10
Strategic procurement and international collaboration to improve access to medicines.通过战略采购和国际合作改善药品可及性。
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Oct 1;95(10):720-722. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.187344. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimated generic prices for novel treatments for drug-resistant tuberculosis.耐多药结核病新型治疗方法的预估仿制药价格。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Apr 1;72(4):1243-1252. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw522.
2
Better life through medicine-let's leave no one behind.借助医学,成就美好生活——不让任何一个人掉队。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):339-341. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31905-5. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
3
Essential medicines for universal health coverage.全民健康覆盖的基本药物。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):403-476. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31599-9. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
4
'Government Patent Use': A Legal Approach To Reducing Drug Spending.“政府专利使用”:降低药品支出的法律途径
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 May 1;35(5):791-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1120.
5
Target prices for mass production of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for global cancer treatment.用于全球癌症治疗的酪氨酸激酶抑制剂大规模生产的目标价格。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 27;6(1):e009586. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009586.
6
Minimum costs for producing hepatitis C direct-acting antivirals for use in large-scale treatment access programs in developing countries.在发展中国家用于大规模治疗获取项目的丙型肝炎直接抗病毒药物的最低生产成本。
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;58(7):928-36. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu012. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
7
Ending drug registration apartheid: taming data exclusivity and patent/registration linkage.终结药品注册的不平等:抑制数据独占性及专利/注册关联
Am J Law Med. 2008;34(2-3):303-44. doi: 10.1177/009885880803400209.
8
Unfair competition under the TRIPS agreement: protection of data submitted for the registration of pharmaceuticals.《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》下的不正当竞争:用于药品注册所提交数据的保护
Chic J Int Law. 2002 Spring;3(1):69-85.

欧盟促进仿制药发展的数据独占权例外与强制许可:

Data exclusivity exceptions and compulsory licensing to promote generic medicines in the European Union: .

作者信息

't Hoen Ellen F M, Boulet Pascale, Baker Brook K

机构信息

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Global Health Unit, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.

Consultant Medicines Law & Policy, 105 route de Lossiège, 74130 Contamine sur Arve, France.

出版信息

J Pharm Policy Pract. 2017 Jun 28;10:19. doi: 10.1186/s40545-017-0107-9. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1186/s40545-017-0107-9
PMID:28670455
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5490222/
Abstract

The challenge of providing access to high-priced patented medicines is a global problem affecting all countries. A decade and a half ago the use of flexibilities contained in the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, in particular compulsory licensing, was seen as a mechanism to respond to high-price medicines for the treatment of HIV/AIDS in low- and middle-income countries. Today a number of upper-income European Union (EU) Member States are contemplating the use of compulsory licensing in their efforts to reduce expenditure on pharmaceutical products. EU regulation of clinical test data protection and the granting of market exclusivity interfere with the effective use of compulsory licensing by EU Member States and can even prevent access to off-patent medicines because they prohibit registration of generic equivalents. EU pharmaceutical legislation should be amended to allow waivers to data and market exclusivity in cases of public health need and when a compulsory or government use license has been issued. Such an amendment can be modelled after existing waivers in the Allowing a public health/compulsory license exception to data and market exclusivity would bring greater coherence between EC regulation of medicinal products and national provisions on compulsory licensing and ensure that Member States can take measures to protect public health and promote access to medicines for all.

摘要

提供高价专利药品的可及性这一挑战是一个影响所有国家的全球性问题。十五年前,利用世界贸易组织《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》中的灵活性条款,尤其是强制许可,被视为应对低收入和中等收入国家治疗艾滋病毒/艾滋病的高价药品问题的一种机制。如今,一些高收入的欧盟成员国正在考虑利用强制许可来努力减少药品支出。欧盟对临床试验数据保护和给予市场独占权的监管干扰了欧盟成员国对强制许可的有效利用,甚至可能阻止非专利药品的可及性,因为这些监管禁止通用等效药品的注册。欧盟药品立法应予以修订,以便在出现公共卫生需求以及已颁发强制或政府使用许可的情况下,允许豁免数据和市场独占权。这样的修订可以仿照现有豁免条款进行。允许对数据和市场独占权设置公共卫生/强制许可例外,将使欧盟药品监管与国家强制许可规定之间更加协调一致,并确保成员国能够采取措施保护公众健康,促进所有人获得药品。