Suppr超能文献

选择规则与累加器网络

Choice Rules and Accumulator Networks.

作者信息

Bhatia Sudeep

机构信息

Behavioral Science Group, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick.

出版信息

Decision (Wash D C ). 2017 Jul;4(3):146-170. doi: 10.1037/dec0000038. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

Abstract

This article presents a preference accumulation model that can be used to implement a number of different multi-attribute heuristic choice rules, including the lexicographic rule, the majority of confirming dimensions (tallying) rule and the equal weights rule. The proposed model differs from existing accumulators in terms of attribute representation: Leakage and competition, typically applied only to preference accumulation, are also assumed to be involved in processing attribute values. This allows the model to perform a range of sophisticated attribute-wise comparisons, including comparisons that compute relative rank. The ability of a preference accumulation model composed of leaky competitive networks to mimic symbolic models of heuristic choice suggests that these 2 approaches are not incompatible, and that a unitary cognitive model of preferential choice, based on insights from both these approaches, may be feasible.

摘要

本文提出了一种偏好积累模型,该模型可用于实现多种不同的多属性启发式选择规则,包括字典序规则、多数确认维度(计分)规则和平等权重规则。所提出的模型在属性表示方面与现有累加器不同:通常仅应用于偏好积累的泄漏和竞争,也被假定参与处理属性值。这使得该模型能够执行一系列复杂的按属性比较,包括计算相对排名的比较。由泄漏竞争网络组成的偏好积累模型模仿启发式选择符号模型的能力表明,这两种方法并非不相容,并且基于这两种方法的见解构建一个统一的偏好选择认知模型可能是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0058/5484390/f7c39c38855f/dec_4_3_146_fig1a.jpg

相似文献

1
Choice Rules and Accumulator Networks.
Decision (Wash D C ). 2017 Jul;4(3):146-170. doi: 10.1037/dec0000038. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
2
Multi-attribute, multi-alternative models of choice: Choice, reaction time, and process tracing.
Cogn Psychol. 2017 Nov;98:45-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
3
4
Decision heuristic or preference? Attribute non-attendance in discrete choice problems.
Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):157-171. doi: 10.1002/hec.3524. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
5
Memory-Based Simple Heuristics as Attribute Substitution: Competitive Tests of Binary Choice Inference Models.
Cogn Sci. 2017 May;41 Suppl 5:1093-1118. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12395. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
6
How do insects choose flowers? A review of multi-attribute flower choice and decoy effects in flower-visiting insects.
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Dec;89(12):2750-2762. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13347. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
7
The 2N-ary Choice Tree Model for N-Alternative Preferential Choice.
Front Psychol. 2012 Jun 20;3:189. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00189. eCollection 2012.
8
Associations and the accumulation of preference.
Psychol Rev. 2013 Jul;120(3):522-43. doi: 10.1037/a0032457. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
9
A Computational Model of Attention Control in Multi-Attribute, Context-Dependent Decision Making.
Front Comput Neurosci. 2019 Jul 10;13:40. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2019.00040. eCollection 2019.
10
Neural Signatures of Rational and Heuristic Choice Strategies: A Single Trial ERP Analysis.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Aug 18;11:401. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00401. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Visual Coding Based on Attraction Effect on Human-Computer Interface.
J Eye Mov Res. 2025 Apr 8;18(2):12. doi: 10.3390/jemr18020012. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Hierarchical competitions subserving multi-attribute choice.
Nat Neurosci. 2014 Nov;17(11):1613-22. doi: 10.1038/nn.3836. Epub 2014 Oct 12.
2
Homo heuristicus: why biased minds make better inferences.
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;1(1):107-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01006.x.
3
Parallel Distributed Processing at 25: further explorations in the microstructure of cognition.
Cogn Sci. 2014 Aug;38(6):1024-77. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12148. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
4
Sequential sampling and paradoxes of risky choice.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Oct;21(5):1095-111. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0650-1. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
5
Single-process versus multiple-strategy models of decision making: evidence from an information intrusion paradigm.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Feb;146:84-96. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
6
Associations and the accumulation of preference.
Psychol Rev. 2013 Jul;120(3):522-43. doi: 10.1037/a0032457. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
7
Testing adaptive toolbox models: a Bayesian hierarchical approach.
Psychol Rev. 2013 Jan;120(1):39-64. doi: 10.1037/a0030777. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
8
Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 12;109(24):9659-64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119569109. Epub 2012 May 25.
9
Optimal decision making in neural inhibition models.
Psychol Rev. 2012 Jan;119(1):201-15. doi: 10.1037/a0026275. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
10
Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 1;108(44):18120-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109322108. Epub 2011 Oct 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验