Qi Xin, Ding Lian, Zhai Wei, Li Qiang, Li Yan, Li Haichao, Wen Bing
a Department of Plastic Surgery & Burns , Peking University First Hospital , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
b Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies , Peking University , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1342523. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1342523.
An increased demand for accountability and transparency in medicine have initiated a shift toward a more objective and standardized approach for postgraduate medical training.
To develop and evaluate an objective method to assess clinical competence of postgraduate year 1 surgery residents.
Thirty-one postgraduate year 1 surgery residents, who had been trained in the Surgical School of Peking University First Hospital for one year, participated in an objective structured clinical examination as a final assessment of their clinical competence. A test station of irregular wound repair (debridement and suture) was specially designed to test the residents' surgical integrative competence in a complex-trauma treatment procedure. A modified global rating scale, in combination with wound area measurement, was applied to evaluate residents' surgical performance. The validity of the subjective global rating scale was evaluated by the objective measurement results from the software.
The global rating scale score had no obvious correlation with the area of the removed tissue and the residual wound area after the suture. There was significant difference in the debridement time and the residual wound area between 0-3 and >3 total stitches. There were significant differences in the area of the removed tissue between 0 and 1-2 grey stitches and 0 and 3-4 grey stitches, and in the residual wound area after suture between 0 and 3-4 grey stitches and 1-2 and 3-4 grey stitches.
An irregular wound repair procedure could be an effective method to assess the integrative competence of surgery residents. The training for surgical thinking in the early stage of junior residents needs to be strengthened. The entire measurement process was more complex and time-consuming than expected. The possibility of measurement by simply counting the numbers of the key spots might be explored in the future.
ACS/APDS American College of Surgeons/Association of Program Directors in Surgery; GRS Global rating scale; LSD-T Least significant difference-test; OSATS Objective structured assessment of technical skills; OSCE Objective structured clinical examination; PBT Proficiency based training; PGY1 Postgraduate Year 1.
医学领域对问责制和透明度的需求增加,已促使向更客观、标准化的研究生医学培训方法转变。
开发并评估一种客观方法,以评估一年级外科住院医师的临床能力。
31名在北京大学第一医院外科学校接受了一年培训的一年级外科住院医师,参加了客观结构化临床考试,作为对其临床能力的最终评估。专门设计了一个不规则伤口修复(清创缝合)测试站,以测试住院医师在复杂创伤治疗过程中的外科综合能力。应用改良的整体评分量表,并结合伤口面积测量,来评估住院医师的手术表现。通过软件的客观测量结果评估主观整体评分量表的有效性。
整体评分量表得分与缝合后切除组织面积和残余伤口面积无明显相关性。总缝线数0 - 3针和>3针之间,清创时间和残余伤口面积有显著差异。0针与1 - 2针灰色缝线、0针与3 - 4针灰色缝线之间切除组织面积有显著差异,0针与3 - 4针灰色缝线、1 - 2针与3 - 4针灰色缝线之间缝合后残余伤口面积有显著差异。
不规则伤口修复程序可能是评估外科住院医师综合能力的有效方法。初级住院医师早期阶段的外科思维训练需要加强。整个测量过程比预期更复杂、耗时。未来可能探索通过简单计算关键点数量进行测量的可能性。
ACS/APDS 美国外科医师学会/外科项目主任协会;GRS 整体评分量表;LSD - T 最小显著差异检验;OSATS 客观结构化技术技能评估;OSCE 客观结构化临床考试;PBT 基于能力的培训;PGY1 一年级研究生