Department of Dentistry, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sharad Pawar Dental College & Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (M), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
J Oral Pathol Med. 2017 Nov;46(10):921-927. doi: 10.1111/jop.12612. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
The binary system of oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) has never been investigated with reference to the carcinogenesis-related biomarkers. Hence, Ki67, CD105, and α-SMA immune-expressions were studied in oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) to assess their relationship with the binary OED grading system of World Health Organization.
The study was carried out on paraffin-embedded tissues of 30 normal oral mucosa (NOM) and 140 OPMD cases. OPMD cases were classified into two groups "no/questionable/hyperkeratosis/mild"=low-risk epithelial dysplasia (LRED) and "moderate or severe"=high-risk epithelial dysplasia (HRED). The immunohistochemistry was carried out to evaluate the expression of Ki67, CD 105, and α-SMA antigen.
According to the binary grading system of WHO, 69 (49.28%) cases were LRED, while 71 (50.71%) case showed HRED. There was significant increase in Ki67 labeling index (LI) from NOM to LRED to HRED (P=.000). Similarly, mean vascular density (MVD) also increased significantly from NOM to LRED to HRED (P=.000). The α-SMA expression was significantly higher in HERD compared to LRED and NOM (P=.000). A positive correlation was noted among Ki67 LI, MVD, and α-SMA expressions in NOM, LRED, and HRED (P=.000).
The expressions of ki67, CD105, and α-SMA markers compliment binary grading system of OED in OPMDS, thus justifying its use in clinical practice.
口腔上皮异型增生(OED)的二元系统从未参照与癌变相关的生物标志物进行过研究。因此,研究了 Ki67、CD105 和 α-SMA 的免疫表达,以评估它们与世界卫生组织二元 OED 分级系统的关系。
本研究对 30 例正常口腔黏膜(NOM)和 140 例口腔黏膜潜在恶性病变(OPMD)病例的石蜡包埋组织进行了研究。OPMD 病例分为两组:“无/可疑/角化/轻度”=低风险上皮异型增生(LRED)和“中重度”=高风险上皮异型增生(HRED)。进行免疫组织化学评估 Ki67、CD105 和 α-SMA 抗原的表达。
根据世界卫生组织的二元分级系统,69 例(49.28%)为 LRED,71 例(50.71%)为 HRED。Ki67 标记指数(LI)从 NOM 到 LRED 到 HRED 显著增加(P=.000)。同样,平均血管密度(MVD)也从 NOM 到 LRED 到 HRED 显著增加(P=.000)。HRED 中 α-SMA 的表达明显高于 LRED 和 NOM(P=.000)。在 NOM、LRED 和 HRED 中,Ki67 LI、MVD 和 α-SMA 表达之间存在正相关(P=.000)。
Ki67、CD105 和 α-SMA 标志物的表达补充了 OPMDS 中 OED 的二元分级系统,因此在临床实践中是合理的。