Yao Hui, Lu Huading, Zhao Huiqing, Lv Lulu, Hou Gang
1 Department of Orthopaedics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
2 Department of Orthopaedics, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, People's Republic of China.
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Oct;38(10):1107-1114. doi: 10.1177/1071100717715908. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
The extensile lateral approach (ELA) has been considered to be a standard approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DICF) because it provides excellent exposure and allows direct reduction of the depressed posterior facet fragment. But continuous retraction during surgery needs sufficient manpower and may cause ischemia. Failure of rigid fixation of DICF will not allow for early weight bearing and may lead to a loss of reduction. To avoid these disadvantages, this study presents open reduction assisted with an external fixator and internal fixation with a calcaneal locking plate.
A series of 58 patients with 62 DICFs were treated over a period of 49 months. All patients were clinically and radiologically followed up with a mean follow-up of 35 (range 29-42) months. Clinical follow-up included visual analog scale (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score, and ability to work. Radiologic follow-up included axial and lateral radiographs and measurements of the Bohler angle and Gissane angle.
At the final follow-up, all fractures had healed. The mean VAS score was 2.9 (range 0 to 8, SD 1.9) and the average AOFAS score was 71 (range 55-85, SD 8.1). The mean postoperative Bohler angle immediately after the surgery was 28.3 degrees (range 13.0-44.6, SD 7.0), which decreased to 27.5 degrees (range 12.2-43.3, SD 7.0) at the final follow-up, and the mean postoperative Gissane angle after the surgery was 116.3 degrees (range 94.9-131.5, SD 9.0) which finally increased to 118.4 degrees (range 94.5-135.8, SD 9.3). No statistically significant differences regarding Bohler and Gissane angles were found between different Sanders fracture types ( P>.05).
The presented operative technique was found to provide comparable reduction of Sanders type II-IV injuries.
Level III, case control study.
扩大外侧入路(ELA)被认为是治疗移位性关节内跟骨骨折(DICF)的标准入路,因为它能提供良好的显露,并允许直接复位后关节面塌陷骨折块。但手术过程中的持续牵拉需要足够的人力,且可能导致缺血。DICF坚强固定失败将不允许早期负重,并可能导致复位丢失。为避免这些缺点,本研究采用外固定器辅助切开复位及跟骨锁定钢板内固定。
在49个月的时间里,对58例患者的62处DICF进行了治疗。所有患者均进行了临床和影像学随访,平均随访35(29 - 42)个月。临床随访包括视觉模拟评分(VAS)、美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)后足评分及工作能力。影像学随访包括跟骨轴位和侧位X线片以及Bohler角和Gissane角的测量。
末次随访时,所有骨折均已愈合。VAS评分平均为2.9(范围0至8,标准差1.9),AOFAS评分平均为71(范围55 - 85,标准差8.1)。术后即刻平均Bohler角为28.3°(范围13.0 - 44.6,标准差7.0),末次随访时降至27.5°(范围12.2 - 43.3,标准差7.0);术后即刻平均Gissane角为116.3°(范围94.9 - 131.5,标准差9.0),最终增至118.4°(范围94.5 - 135.8,标准差9.3)。不同Sanders骨折类型之间,Bohler角和Gissane角差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。
所提出的手术技术在Sanders II - IV型损伤复位方面效果相当。
III级,病例对照研究。