The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Sep;47:153-160. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
An open cohort study (LiveRLife) evaluating an intervention integrating non-invasive liver disease assessment via transient elastography (TE) among people who inject drugs (PWID) was conducted in New South Wales, Australia. Participant follow-up occurred 2-16 weeks post-enrolment. It is imperative that PWID understand liver assessment results in order to make informed decisions about their health. The aim of this study was to evaluate the decisions and experiences of participants who received a liver disease assessment, including interpretation of TE score and subsequent health behaviours, using a health literacy framework.
Participants who had participated in LiveRLife were recruited from two opioid substitution treatment clinics and one medically supervised injecting centre between November 2015 and February 2016. The four recruitment categories were: (a) high TE score (≥9.5kPa)/attended follow-up, n=12; (b) high score/did not attend follow-up, n=2; (c) low score (<9.5kPa)/attended follow-up, n=11; and (d) low score/did not attend follow-up, n=8. Participants were not reminded of their category during recruitment. Inclusion criteria were: participants who received a TE score and informed consent.
Of 33 semi-structured interviews, reasons for receiving a TE assessment were varied. Most participants interpreted level of liver disease correctly based on their TE score. Participants with higher TE scores frequently described feeling surprised by their result and also, often incorrectly identified drug use as a cause of advanced liver disease. In contrast, persons with lower TE scores felt encouraged by their result and spoke more to maintenance of healthy behaviours. When applicable, participants spoke of HCV therapy.
Findings highlight some positive health changes made by PWID following liver disease assessment as well as ongoing misunderstandings of chronic liver disease in relation to illicit drug use. Results will inform strategies for targeted liver health education and 'linkage to care' for PWID with, and at-risk of, advanced liver disease.
在澳大利亚新南威尔士州开展了一项开放队列研究(LiveRLife),评估了一项通过瞬时弹性成像(TE)对注射吸毒者(PWID)进行非侵入性肝病评估的干预措施。参与者的随访发生在入组后 2-16 周。PWID 必须了解肝脏评估结果,以便就他们的健康做出明智的决策。本研究的目的是使用健康素养框架评估接受肝脏疾病评估的参与者的决策和经验,包括 TE 评分的解释和随后的健康行为。
2015 年 11 月至 2016 年 2 月期间,从两家阿片类药物替代治疗诊所和一家医疗监督注射中心招募了参加过 LiveRLife 的参与者。有四种招募类别:(a)高 TE 评分(≥9.5kPa)/参加随访,n=12;(b)高评分/未参加随访,n=2;(c)低评分(<9.5kPa)/参加随访,n=11;(d)低评分/未参加随访,n=8。在招募过程中,未提醒参与者他们的类别。纳入标准是:接受 TE 评分和知情同意的参与者。
在 33 次半结构化访谈中,接受 TE 评估的原因各不相同。大多数参与者根据他们的 TE 评分正确地解释了肝病的程度。TE 评分较高的参与者经常感到惊讶于他们的结果,而且往往错误地将药物使用视为导致晚期肝病的原因。相比之下,TE 评分较低的人对他们的结果感到鼓舞,并更多地谈到保持健康的行为。在适用的情况下,参与者谈到了 HCV 治疗。
研究结果突出了 PWID 在接受肝病评估后所做出的一些积极的健康改变,以及他们对与非法药物使用有关的慢性肝病的持续误解。结果将为针对 PWID 和有/高危晚期肝病的人提供有针对性的肝脏健康教育和“链接至护理”的策略提供信息。