Suppr超能文献

在一级创伤中心的常规实践中检验简短酒精干预服务的覆盖范围。

Examining the reach of a brief alcohol intervention service in routine practice at a level 1 trauma center.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 359896, 325 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 359896, 325 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, USA..

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Aug;79:29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 May 20.

Abstract

The American College of Surgeons requires Level I and II trauma centers to provide brief intervention services to traumatically injured patients who screen positive for alcohol. Despite evidence supporting substantial cost savings and reduced re-injury associated with these services, brief interventions may not be uniformly delivered owing to a variety of demographic, clinical and operational characteristics. To inform service adjustments that may improve the reach of such services, we compared trauma patients who did and did not receive brief alcohol intervention services during their hospitalizations. Electronic medical records of injured patients admitted to a Level I trauma center between September 27, 2013 and March 11, 2014 with a positive blood alcohol concentration (N=189) were coded for demographic and clinical variables. Records of those who did not receive a brief intervention during their admission were reviewed for possible reasons why interventions were not delivered. Of the total sample, 115 patients (60.8%) received brief interventions. Patients who did and did not receive brief interventions did not differ on age, sex, race, blood alcohol concentration at admission, or mechanism of injury, indicating that patient characteristics were unlikely to bias service delivery. Instead, common features of patients who were referred but did not receive SBIRT interventions included admissions lasting fewer than two working days (12.7%) and persistent cognitive impairment following injury (9.0%). These findings align with previous studies suggesting that service reach could be improved by promoting dedicated and flexible staffing and adapting services to allow for SBIRT delivery in follow-up care settings.

摘要

美国外科医师学会要求一级和二级创伤中心为创伤性损伤且酒精筛查阳性的患者提供短暂干预服务。尽管有证据表明这些服务可以节省大量成本并减少再次受伤,但由于各种人口统计学、临床和运营特征,短暂干预措施可能无法统一实施。为了告知可能改善这些服务覆盖范围的服务调整,我们比较了在住院期间接受和未接受短暂酒精干预服务的创伤患者。对 2013 年 9 月 27 日至 2014 年 3 月 11 日期间入住一级创伤中心、血液酒精浓度呈阳性的受伤患者的电子病历进行了编码,以获取人口统计学和临床变量。对那些在住院期间未接受短暂干预的患者的记录进行了审查,以了解未提供干预措施的可能原因。在总样本中,有 115 名患者(60.8%)接受了短暂干预。接受和未接受短暂干预的患者在年龄、性别、种族、入院时的血液酒精浓度或损伤机制方面没有差异,这表明患者特征不太可能影响服务的提供。相反,被转介但未接受 SBIRT 干预的患者的共同特征包括住院时间少于两个工作日(12.7%)和受伤后持续存在认知障碍(9.0%)。这些发现与之前的研究一致,表明通过促进专门和灵活的人员配备以及调整服务以允许在后续护理环境中提供 SBIRT,可以提高服务的覆盖面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9ecc/5841453/b53e2bf13ff0/nihms929782f1.jpg

相似文献

7
Feasibility of alcohol screening and brief intervention.酒精筛查与简短干预的可行性
J Trauma. 2005 Sep;59(3 Suppl):S119-23; discussion S124-33. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000174679.12567.7c.
10

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验