• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三个单环增强了用于后半月板根部修复的经胫骨拉出技术的生物力学性能。

Three single loops enhance the biomechanical behavior of the transtibial pull-out technique for posterior meniscal root repair.

作者信息

Camarda Lawrence, Pitarresi Giuseppe, Lauria Michele, Fazzari Federico, D'Arienzo Michele

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (DiChirOnS), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, Palermo, Italy.

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Chimica, Gestionale, Informatica e Meccanica (DICGIM), University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Sep;137(9):1301-1306. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2739-2. Epub 2017 Jul 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-017-2739-2
PMID:28674738
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of applying an additional suture to enhance the biomechanical behavior of the suture-meniscus construct used during the transtibial pull-out repair technique.

METHODS

A total of 20 fresh-frozen porcine tibiae with intact medial menisci were used. In one half of all specimens (N = 10), two non-absorbable sutures were passed directly over the meniscal root from the tibia side of the meniscus to the femoral side (2SS). In other ten specimens, three sutures were passed over the meniscal root (3SS). All specimens were subjected to cyclic loading followed by load-to-failure testing. Displacement of the construct was recorded at 100, 500, and 1000 cycles. Further, stiffness (500-1000 cycles) and ultimate load and modes of failure of the suture-meniscus construct were also recorded.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the Group 2SS and Group 3SS at the 1st (1.6 ± 0.7 vs 1.4 ± 0.4 mm) and the 100th cycle (2 ± 0.7 vs 1.8 ± 0.4 mm). At 500 and 1000 cycles, the 2SS fixation technique resulted in significantly more displacement than the 3SS fixation technique (2.8 ± 0.6 vs 2.3 ± 0.5 mm; 3.1 ± 0.7 vs 2.5 ± 0.5 mm) (p < 0.05). No differences between two groups were noted concerning ultimate load to failure and stiffness (500-1000 cycles).

CONCLUSION

Three single sutures technique provided superior biomechanical properties compared with the two single sutures technique during the conducted fatigue tests.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Applying three simple stitches during meniscal root repair might be beneficial for healing of the posterior meniscal root, potentially reducing the post-operative immobilization time.

摘要

目的

研究在经胫骨拉出修复技术中应用额外缝线以增强缝线 - 半月板结构生物力学性能的效果。

方法

共使用20个带有完整内侧半月板的新鲜冷冻猪胫骨。在所有标本的一半(N = 10)中,两条不可吸收缝线直接从半月板胫骨侧穿过半月板根部至股骨侧(2SS)。在另外10个标本中,三条缝线穿过半月板根部(3SS)。所有标本先进行循环加载,然后进行破坏载荷测试。在100、500和1000个循环时记录结构的位移。此外,还记录了刚度(500 - 1000个循环)、缝线 - 半月板结构的极限载荷和破坏模式。

结果

在第1个循环(1.6 ± 0.7对1.4 ± 0.4毫米)和第100个循环(2 ± 0.7对1.8 ± 0.4毫米)时,2SS组和3SS组之间无统计学显著差异。在500和1000个循环时,2SS固定技术导致的位移明显多于3SS固定技术(2.8 ± 0.6对2.3 ± 0.5毫米;3.1 ± 0.7对2.5 ± 0.5毫米)(p < 0.05)。两组在破坏极限载荷和刚度(500 - 1000个循环)方面未发现差异。

结论

在进行的疲劳试验中,与两条单缝线技术相比,三条单缝线技术具有更好的生物力学性能。

临床意义

在半月板根部修复过程中应用三条简单缝线可能有利于半月板后根部的愈合,潜在地减少术后固定时间。

相似文献

1
Three single loops enhance the biomechanical behavior of the transtibial pull-out technique for posterior meniscal root repair.三个单环增强了用于后半月板根部修复的经胫骨拉出技术的生物力学性能。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Sep;137(9):1301-1306. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2739-2. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
2
Cyclic displacement after meniscal root repair fixation: a human biomechanical evaluation.半月板根部修复固定后的周期性移位:一项人体生物力学评估
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):892-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546514562554. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
3
Biomechanical evaluation of a transtibial pull-out meniscal root repair: challenging the bungee effect.经胫骨半月板根部拉出修复术的生物力学评估:挑战弹力带效应
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Dec;42(12):2988-95. doi: 10.1177/0363546514549447. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
4
Biomechanical evaluation of different suture techniques for arthroscopic transtibial pull-out repair of posterior medial meniscus root tears.关节镜下经胫骨隧道前内侧半月板后根部撕裂伤的不同缝合技术的生物力学评估。
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Dec;41(12):2784-90. doi: 10.1177/0363546513502464. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
5
Utilization of Transtibial Centralization Suture Best Minimizes Extrusion and Restores Tibiofemoral Contact Mechanics for Anatomic Medial Meniscal Root Repairs in a Cadaveric Model.在尸体模型中,利用经胫骨中央化缝合术可最大程度减少挤出并恢复胫股接触力学,从而实现解剖内侧半月板根部修复。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jun;47(7):1591-1600. doi: 10.1177/0363546519844250. Epub 2019 May 15.
6
A simple cinch is superior to a locking loop for meniscus root repair: a human biomechanical comparison of suture constructs in a transtibial pull-out model.简单结扎优于半月板根部修复的锁定环:经胫骨牵拉模型中缝合结构的人体生物力学比较。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Aug;26(8):2239-2244. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4652-1. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
7
The role of suture cutout in the failure of meniscal root repair during the early post-operative period: a biomechanical study.缝线穿出在半月板根部修复术后早期失败中的作用:一项生物力学研究。
Int Orthop. 2018 Apr;42(4):811-818. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3799-9. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
8
The Strength of Transosseous Medial Meniscal Root Repair Using a Simple Suture Technique Is Dependent on Suture Material and Position.经皮内侧半月板后根缝合修复术的强度取决于缝线材料和位置。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;46(4):924-932. doi: 10.1177/0363546517749807. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
9
Biomechanical comparison between suture anchor and transtibial pull-out repair for posterior medial meniscus root tears.后内侧半月板根部撕裂的缝合锚钉与胫骨隧道拉出修复的生物力学比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Jan;42(1):187-93. doi: 10.1177/0363546513502946. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
10
Biomechanical evaluation of the transtibial pull-out technique for posterior medial meniscal root repairs using 1 and 2 transtibial bone tunnels.使用单根和双根经胫骨骨隧道对后内侧半月板根部修复的经胫骨拔出技术进行生物力学评估。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):899-904. doi: 10.1177/0363546514563278. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel meniscal root refixation pull-in technique with an all-suture anchor shows biomechanical properties comparable to standard suture anchor and transtibial pull-out techniques.一种采用全缝线锚钉的新型半月板根部修复拉入技术,其生物力学性能与标准缝线锚钉和经胫骨拉出技术相当。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jun 15;12(2):e70310. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70310. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Short-term results of tibial interference screw fixation for transtibial medial meniscus posterior root pull-out repair.经胫骨内侧半月板后根撕脱修复术中胫骨挤压螺钉固定的短期疗效
J Orthop. 2024 Jan 5;50:155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.12.017. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Quantifying the differential functional behavior between the medial and lateral meniscus after posterior meniscus root tears.
定量分析后半月板根部撕裂后内侧和外侧半月板的功能差异行为。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 10;16(11):e0259678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259678. eCollection 2021.
4
Arthroscopic Medial Meniscal Posterior Root Repair With Transtibial Luggage-Tag and Horizontal Mattress Sutures.关节镜下采用经胫骨行李牌和水平褥式缝合修复内侧半月板后根
Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Jan 20;10(1):e21-e27. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.09.004. eCollection 2021 Jan.