• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

蜂类毒液过敏与合并恶性肿瘤的特异性免疫治疗:回顾性随访关注有效性和安全性。

Specific Immunotherapy in Hymenoptera Venom Allergy and Concomitant Malignancy: A Retrospective Follow-up Focusing on Effectiveness and Safety.

机构信息

Allergy Unit Zieglerspital, Clinic of Internal Medicine, Spital Netz Bern AG, Bern, Switzerland.

Division of Allergology, University Clinic of Rheumatology, Immunology & Allergology, Inselspital/University Hospital Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2017;27(6):370-377. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0184. Epub 2017 Jul 4.

DOI:10.18176/jiaci.0184
PMID:28675375
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malignancies are often considered a contraindication for allergen-specific immunotherapy. Consequently, patients with severe Hymenoptera venom allergy and cancer require specific care. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy and cancer undergoing venom immunotherapy (VIT).

METHODS

The study population comprised all patients referred for evaluation of Hymenoptera venom allergy or for a routine check-up during VIT from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2008.

RESULTS

Of the patients assessed, 2% (51 of 2594) had a documented Hymenoptera venom allergy and cancer (25 female, 26 male; mean age 58 years). Of these, 42 patients received VIT (82%): 25 patients had a previously diagnosed malignancy, 16 were diagnosed with malignancy during VIT, and 1 patient was diagnosed with cancer after completion of VIT. The most frequent type of tumor was breast cancer in female patients (60%) and prostate cancer in male patients (39%). Systemic allergic reactions during VIT were recorded in 7% of patients. A total of 19 patients experienced a field sting or underwent a sting challenge test during VIT: 95% tolerated the sting well. VIT was halted definitively in 9 patients (new diagnosis of cancer in 7 patients, reactivation of cancer in 1, and progressive polyneuropathy in 1).

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness and adverse effects of VIT in patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy and cancer in remission are comparable to those of patients without malignancy. Our findings show that patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy and cancer are eligible for VIT.

摘要

背景

恶性肿瘤通常被认为是变应原特异性免疫治疗的禁忌症。因此,患有严重蜂类毒液过敏和癌症的患者需要特殊的护理。本回顾性研究旨在评估接受蜂类毒液免疫治疗(VIT)的蜂类毒液过敏和癌症患者。

方法

研究人群包括所有因评估蜂类毒液过敏或在 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日期间接受常规 VIT 检查而就诊的患者。

结果

在评估的患者中,有 2%(2594 例中有 51 例)记录有蜂类毒液过敏和癌症(25 例女性,26 例男性;平均年龄 58 岁)。其中,42 例患者接受了 VIT(82%):25 例患者先前诊断患有恶性肿瘤,16 例在 VIT 期间诊断患有恶性肿瘤,1 例在完成 VIT 后诊断患有癌症。女性患者最常见的肿瘤类型是乳腺癌(60%),男性患者最常见的肿瘤类型是前列腺癌(39%)。在 VIT 期间记录到 7%的患者发生全身性过敏反应。共有 19 例患者在 VIT 期间经历了野外蜇伤或接受了蜇伤挑战试验:95%的患者蜇伤后反应良好。共有 9 例患者(7 例新诊断为癌症,1 例癌症复发,1 例进行性多神经病)最终停止了 VIT。

结论

在缓解期的蜂类毒液过敏和癌症患者中,VIT 的有效性和不良反应与无恶性肿瘤患者相似。我们的研究结果表明,蜂类毒液过敏和癌症患者有资格接受 VIT。

相似文献

1
Specific Immunotherapy in Hymenoptera Venom Allergy and Concomitant Malignancy: A Retrospective Follow-up Focusing on Effectiveness and Safety.蜂类毒液过敏与合并恶性肿瘤的特异性免疫治疗:回顾性随访关注有效性和安全性。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2017;27(6):370-377. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0184. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
2
Rush hymenoptera venom immunotherapy is efficacious and safe.速发型膜翅目毒液免疫疗法有效且安全。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2006;16(4):232-8.
3
Predictors of side effects during the buildup phase of venom immunotherapy for Hymenoptera venom allergy: the importance of baseline serum tryptase.变应原免疫治疗蜂类毒液过敏的诱导期不良反应预测因素:基础血清类胰蛋白酶的重要性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Jul;126(1):105-11.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.04.025. Epub 2010 Jun 12.
4
Comparison of the Safety Profiles of 3 Different Hymenoptera Venom Immunotherapy Protocols: A Retrospective 2-Center Study of 143 Patients.比较 3 种不同膜翅目毒液免疫治疗方案的安全性特征:对 143 例患者的回顾性 2 中心研究。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2020;181(10):783-789. doi: 10.1159/000509187. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
5
A simple 3-day "rush" venom immunotherapy protocol: documentation of safety.一种简单的为期3天的“快速”毒液免疫疗法方案:安全性记录。
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2010 Mar-Apr;38(2):69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Oct 22.
6
Clinical aspects of hymenoptera venom allergy and venom immunotherapy.膜翅目昆虫毒液过敏与毒液免疫疗法的临床方面
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019 Nov;51(6):244-258. doi: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.113.
7
Efficacy and safety of hymenoptera venom immunotherapy.蜂毒免疫治疗的疗效和安全性。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2024 Jul 1;45(4):268-275. doi: 10.2500/aap.2024.45.240035.
8
When can immunotherapy for insect sting allergy be stopped?昆虫叮咬过敏的免疫疗法何时可以停止?
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 May-Jun;3(3):324-8; quiz 329-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.11.018.
9
Skin Test Reactivity to Hymenoptera Venom after Venom Immunotherapy Correlates Inversely with the IgG/IgE Ratio.毒液免疫治疗后对膜翅目毒液的皮肤试验反应性与IgG/IgE比值呈负相关。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;174(3-4):190-199. doi: 10.1159/000481255. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
10
Safety of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors while receiving venom immunotherapy.接受毒液免疫治疗时血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的安全性。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Oct;101(4):426-30. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60321-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Shedding Lights on Crude Venom from Solitary Foraging Predatory Ant : Initial Toxinological Investigation.揭示独居性捕食性蚂蚁粗毒液的奥秘:初步的毒素学研究。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Jan 4;14(1):37. doi: 10.3390/toxins14010037.
2
Cancer: Still a contraindication for allergen immunotherapy?: Specific immunotherapy and cancer.癌症:仍然是变应原免疫疗法的禁忌症吗?:特异性免疫疗法与癌症
World Allergy Organ J. 2021 Oct 15;14(10):100597. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100597. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Safety of specific immunotherapy using an ultra-rush induction regimen in bee and wasp allergy.
特异性免疫治疗使用超快速诱导方案治疗蜜蜂和黄蜂过敏的安全性。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Feb 1;14(2):288-291. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1397245. Epub 2017 Dec 6.