Klemm W R
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1985 Dec;23(6):911-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(85)90091-7.
Typical neuroleptics, such as haloperidol, are cataleptogenic. But since such drugs block both D1 and D2 receptors, it is not clear if there is a differential receptor role in catalepsy. To test this issue in a mouse model of catalepsy, these experiments tested molindone, a D2-blocking neuroleptic with almost no ability to block D1 receptors. If D1 receptor blockade is necessary for catalepsy, molindone should not cause catalepsy. But molindone was cataleptogenic, albeit less potent than haloperidol. There was also a "training effect" with haloperidol, but not saline or molindone, in that the catalepsy produced by 5 mg/kg of haloperidol was much greater when tests were performed repeatedly at short intervals after injection. Concurrent administration of apomorphine (4 or 8 mg/kg) markedly potentiated haloperidol catalepsy, but had no effect on molindone catalepsy. Such results are not readily interpretable solely in terms of current concepts of D1 and D2 receptors.
典型的抗精神病药物,如氟哌啶醇,具有致僵作用。但由于这类药物同时阻断D1和D2受体,因此尚不清楚在僵住症中是否存在不同的受体作用。为了在僵住症小鼠模型中测试这个问题,这些实验使用了吗茚酮,一种几乎没有能力阻断D1受体的D2阻断型抗精神病药物。如果阻断D1受体是僵住症所必需的,那么吗茚酮不应导致僵住症。但吗茚酮具有致僵作用,尽管其效力比氟哌啶醇弱。氟哌啶醇还存在“训练效应”,而生理盐水或吗茚酮则没有,即当在注射后短时间间隔内重复进行测试时,5毫克/千克的氟哌啶醇产生的僵住症要强得多。同时给予阿扑吗啡(4或8毫克/千克)可显著增强氟哌啶醇的僵住症,但对吗茚酮所致僵住症没有影响。仅根据目前关于D1和D2受体的概念,这些结果难以解释。