Tan Pui San, Bilger Marcel, de Lima Lopes Gilberto, Acharyya Sanchalika, Haaland Benjamin
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Cancer Med. 2017 Aug;6(8):1847-1860. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1101. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
Evidence has suggested survival benefits of maintenance for advanced NSCLC patients not progressing after first-line chemotherapy. Additionally, particular first-line targeted therapies have shown survival improvements in selected populations. Optimal first-line and maintenance therapies remain unclear. Here, currently available evidence was synthesized to elucidate optimal first-line and maintenance therapy within patient groups. Literature was searched for randomized trials evaluating first-line and maintenance regimens in advanced NSCLC patients. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed within molecularly and clinically selected groups. The primary outcome was combined clinically meaningful OS and PFS benefits. A total of 87 records on 56 trials evaluating first-line treatments with maintenance were included. Results showed combined clinically meaningful OS and PFS benefits with particular first-line with maintenance treatments, (1) first-line intercalated chemotherapy+erlotinib, maintenance erlotinib in patients with EGFR mutations, (2) first-line afatinib, maintenance afatinib in patients with EGFR deletion 19, (3) first-line chemotherapy + bevacizumab, maintenance bevacizumab in EGFR wild-type patients, (4) chemotherapy+conatumumab, maintenance conatumumab in patients with squamous histology, (5) chemotherapy+cetuximab, maintenance cetuximab or chemotherapy + necitumumab, maintenance necitumumab in EGFR FISH-positive patients with squamous histology, and (6) first-line chemotherapy+bevacizumab, maintenance bevacizumab or first-line sequential chemotherapy+gefitinib, maintenance gefitinib in patients clinically enriched for EGFR mutations with nonsquamous histology. No treatment showed combined clinically meaningful OS and PFS benefits in patients with EGFR L858R or nonsquamous histology. Particular first-line with maintenance treatments show meaningful OS and PFS benefits in patients selected by EGFR mutation or histology. Further research is needed to achieve effective therapy for patients with EGFR mutation L858R or nonsquamous histology.
有证据表明,对于一线化疗后未进展的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,维持治疗具有生存获益。此外,特定的一线靶向治疗已在特定人群中显示出生存改善。最佳的一线和维持治疗方案仍不明确。在此,综合目前可用的证据以阐明患者群体中的最佳一线和维持治疗。检索文献以查找评估晚期NSCLC患者一线和维持治疗方案的随机试验。在分子和临床选择的组内进行贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。主要结局是临床意义上的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)获益的综合结果。总共纳入了56项评估一线治疗加维持治疗的试验的87条记录。结果显示,特定的一线加维持治疗具有临床意义上的OS和PFS综合获益,(1)一线序贯化疗+厄洛替尼,EGFR突变患者维持使用厄洛替尼;(2)一线阿法替尼,EGFR 19号外显子缺失患者维持使用阿法替尼;(3)一线化疗+贝伐单抗,EGFR野生型患者维持使用贝伐单抗;(4)化疗+考尼伐单抗,鳞状组织学患者维持使用考尼伐单抗;(5)化疗+西妥昔单抗,EGFR FISH阳性的鳞状组织学患者维持使用西妥昔单抗或化疗+奈昔妥单抗,维持使用奈昔妥单抗;(6)一线化疗+贝伐单抗,维持使用贝伐单抗或一线序贯化疗+吉非替尼,临床富集EGFR突变的非鳞状组织学患者维持使用吉非替尼。对于EGFR L858R突变或非鳞状组织学患者,没有治疗方案显示出临床意义上的OS和PFS综合获益。特定的一线加维持治疗方案在通过EGFR突变或组织学选择的患者中显示出有意义的OS和PFS获益。需要进一步研究以实现对EGFR L858R突变或非鳞状组织学患者的有效治疗。