Hassan Ahmed N, Howe Aaron S, Samokhvalov Andriy V, Le Foll Bernard, George Tony P
Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Division of Brain and Therapeutics, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Addict. 2017 Sep;26(6):551-563. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12581. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
Patients with opioid use disorders and mood and anxiety symptoms have a variable prognosis. Few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated treatment of depression or anxiety in patients receiving opioid agonist therapies (OAT). This review evaluates studies of pharmacotherapy/psychotherapy for treating symptoms of depression or anxiety in patients receiving OAT.
Public databases were searched for clinical trials of pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy for managing depression or anxiety symptoms in adults receiving OAT. Subsequently, we conducted a random effects meta-analysis model of RCTs by antidepressants subclasses.
In our literature search, we identified 22 RCTs, eight of which were eligible for meta-analysis. Seven studies evaluated antidepressants in patients already maintained on OAT; two studies reported significant results for antidepressant effects versus placebo. Similarly, two of the seven studies that initiated antidepressants with OAT had advantages over placebo. Meta-analysis of grouped data revealed that tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) (n = 235) significantly improved mean depression scores (SMD = -2.35, 95%CI: [-4.35, -0.34], z = -2.29, p = .022) while Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) (n = 311) were not significantly different than placebo (SMD = 0.47, 95%CI: [-0.35, 1.30], z = 1.12, p = .263). Four out of five studies that implemented psychotherapeutic approaches reported a greater reduction of depressive symptoms than the comparison group.
To date, psychotherapy has the most documented evidence for efficacy. TCAs appears effective but with more adverse effects than SSRIs. Further studies of OAT and adjunct antidepressant treatments for dual diagnosis patients are warranted. (Am J Addict 2017;26:551-563).
患有阿片类药物使用障碍以及伴有情绪和焦虑症状的患者预后各不相同。很少有随机对照试验(RCT)评估接受阿片类激动剂疗法(OAT)的患者的抑郁或焦虑治疗情况。本综述评估了针对接受OAT治疗的患者的抑郁或焦虑症状进行药物治疗/心理治疗的研究。
在公共数据库中搜索针对接受OAT治疗的成年人管理抑郁或焦虑症状的药物治疗或心理治疗的临床试验。随后,我们按抗抑郁药亚类对RCT进行了随机效应荟萃分析模型。
在文献检索中,我们识别出22项RCT,其中8项符合荟萃分析条件。7项研究评估了已接受OAT维持治疗的患者使用抗抑郁药的情况;2项研究报告了抗抑郁药相对于安慰剂的显著疗效。同样,7项在开始使用OAT时联用抗抑郁药的研究中有2项比安慰剂更具优势。分组数据的荟萃分析显示,三环类抗抑郁药(TCA)(n = 235)显著改善了平均抑郁评分(标准化均数差[SMD] = -2.35,95%置信区间:[-4.35, -0.34],z = -2.29,p = 0.022),而选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)(n = 311)与安慰剂无显著差异(SMD = 0.47,95%置信区间:[-0.35, 1.30],z = 1.12,p = 0.263)。实施心理治疗方法的5项研究中有4项报告称抑郁症状的减轻程度大于对照组。
迄今为止,心理治疗有最多的疗效记录证据。三环类抗抑郁药似乎有效,但不良反应比选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂更多。有必要对双重诊断患者的OAT和辅助抗抑郁治疗进行进一步研究。(《美国成瘾杂志》2017年;26:551 - 563)