• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Outcomes in a nurse-led peripherally inserted central catheter program: a retrospective cohort study.一项由护士主导的经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管项目的结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2017 Jun 30;5(3):E535-E539. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20170010.
2
Complication rates among peripherally inserted central venous catheters and centrally inserted central catheters in the medical intensive care unit.医学重症监护病房中经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管与经中心静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的并发症发生率。
J Crit Care. 2016 Feb;31(1):238-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
3
Are cuffed peripherally inserted central catheters superior to uncuffed peripherally inserted central catheters? A retrospective review in a tertiary pediatric center.带囊外周静脉置入中心导管优于无囊外周静脉置入中心导管吗?三级儿科中心的回顾性研究。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Sep;24(9):1316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 May 3.
4
Quality improvement initiative to reduce deep vein thrombosis associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in adults with cystic fibrosis.改善成年囊性纤维化患者外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管相关深静脉血栓形成的质量改进措施。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Nov;11(9):1404-10. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201404-175OC.
5
The effect of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) valve technology on catheter occlusion rates--the 'ELeCTRiC' study.外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)瓣膜技术对导管堵塞率的影响——“ELeCTRiC”研究
J Vasc Access. 2012 Oct-Dec;13(4):421-5. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000071.
6
The role of a surveillance programme for intro-ducing peripherally inserted central catheters: a 2-year observational study in an academic hospital.一项关于引入外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的监测计划的作用:在一家学术医院进行的为期2年的观察性研究。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 May 11;147:w14441. doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14441. eCollection 2017.
7
Comparison of catheter-related large vein thrombosis in centrally inserted versus peripherally inserted central venous lines in the neurological intensive care unit.神经重症监护病房中中心静脉置管与外周静脉中心静脉置管相关的大静脉血栓形成的比较。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Jul;115(7):879-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.08.025. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
8
Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in cancer patients under chemotherapy: A prospective study on the incidence of complications and overall failures.化疗期间癌症患者的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC):并发症发生率及总体失败情况的前瞻性研究
J Surg Oncol. 2016 May;113(6):708-14. doi: 10.1002/jso.24220. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
9
Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Following Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Exchange: An Analysis of 23,000 Hospitalized Patients.外周置入中心静脉导管(PICC)置管后静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的风险:23000 例住院患者的分析。
Am J Med. 2018 Jun;131(6):651-660. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
10
A team-based multidisciplinary approach to managing peripherally inserted central catheter complications in high-risk haematological patients: a prospective study.一种基于团队的多学科方法用于管理高危血液学患者的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管并发症:一项前瞻性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Jan;24(1):93-101. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2754-1. Epub 2015 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurses' knowledge, attitude, and practice in peripherally inserted central catheter-related thrombosis prophylactic practices: A multicentric cross-sectional study.护士在外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管相关血栓预防措施方面的知识、态度和实践:一项多中心横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Apr 25;104(17):e42005. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042005.
2
Effectiveness of a nurse-led peripherally inserted central catheter service: A retrospective cohort study.护士主导的经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管服务的有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Vasc Access. 2025 Jul;26(4):1257-1264. doi: 10.1177/11297298241263886. Epub 2024 Aug 11.
3
Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review.肿瘤学中中央静脉通路装置的术语、并发症和移除原因:范围综述。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12099-8.
4
Implementation of a vascular access team and an intravenous therapy programme: A first-year activity analysis.血管通路团队及静脉治疗方案的实施:第一年活动分析
J Vasc Access. 2025 Mar;26(2):432-440. doi: 10.1177/11297298231220537. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
5
Making a difference? A retrospective review of peripherally inserted central catheters: A single-center experience in Colombia.有影响吗?外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的回顾性研究:哥伦比亚的单中心经验。
SAGE Open Med. 2023 Oct 5;11:20503121231201349. doi: 10.1177/20503121231201349. eCollection 2023.
6
The safe implementation of peripherally inserted central catheters by nurse practitioners for patients with gastroenterological diseases in Japan: a single-center retrospective study.日本胃肠病患者由执业护师实施外周置入中心静脉导管的安全性:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Surg Today. 2024 May;54(5):487-495. doi: 10.1007/s00595-023-02748-z. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
7
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related Infectious Myositis: A Case Report.外周置入中心静脉导管相关性感染性肌炎:病例报告。
Am J Case Rep. 2022 Oct 7;23:e937215. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.937215.
8
The incidence and risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheters in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.住院患者外周静脉置入中心静脉导管相关静脉血栓栓塞的发生率及风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 26;9:917572. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.917572. eCollection 2022.
9
Reduction of central line-associated bloodstream infections in a large acute care hospital in Midwest United States following implementation of a comprehensive central line insertion and maintenance bundle.在美国中西部一家大型急症护理医院实施全面的中心静脉导管插入和维护集束化措施后,中心静脉导管相关血流感染率降低。
J Infect Prev. 2021 Sep;22(5):186-193. doi: 10.1177/17571774211012471. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
10
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement in a Cardiology Ward: A Focus Group Study of Nurses' Perspectives.心内科病房外周置入中心静脉导管置管:护士观点的焦点小组研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 17;18(14):7618. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147618.

本文引用的文献

1
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-Related Infections in a Cohort of Hospitalized Adult Patients.外周置入中心静脉导管相关性感染的住院成年患者队列研究。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016 Mar;39(3):385-93. doi: 10.1007/s00270-015-1182-4. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
2
Catheter-associated bloodstream infections and thrombotic risk in hematologic patients with peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC).外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管(PICC)的血液病患者的导管相关血流感染及血栓形成风险
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Nov;23(11):3289-95. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2740-7. Epub 2015 Apr 26.
3
Peripherally inserted central catheter-related deep vein thrombosis: contemporary patterns and predictors.经外周插入中心静脉导管相关的深静脉血栓形成:当代的模式和预测因素。
J Thromb Haemost. 2014 Jun;12(6):847-54. doi: 10.1111/jth.12549.
4
The risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheters compared with central venous catheters in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人外周静脉置入中心静脉导管与中心静脉导管相关血流感染风险的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;34(9):908-18. doi: 10.1086/671737. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
5
Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.与经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管相关的静脉血栓栓塞风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2013 Jul 27;382(9889):311-25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60592-9. Epub 2013 May 20.
6
Diagnosing and reporting of central line-associated bloodstream infections.中心静脉导管相关性血流感染的诊断和报告。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;33(9):875-82. doi: 10.1086/667379. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
7
Bloodstream infection, venous thrombosis, and peripherally inserted central catheters: reappraising the evidence.血流感染、静脉血栓形成和外周置入中心静脉导管:重新评估证据。
Am J Med. 2012 Aug;125(8):733-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.04.010.
8
Dressing disruption is a major risk factor for catheter-related infections.敷料脱落是导致导管相关感染的一个主要危险因素。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1707-14. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824e0d46.
9
Incidence and predictive factors of symptomatic thrombosis related to peripherally inserted central catheters in chemotherapy patients.化疗患者外周置入中心静脉导管相关症状性血栓的发生率及预测因素。
Thromb Res. 2012 Sep;130(3):323-6. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.02.048. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
10
Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.血管内导管相关感染预防指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52(9):e162-93. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir257. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

一项由护士主导的经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管项目的结局:一项回顾性队列研究。

Outcomes in a nurse-led peripherally inserted central catheter program: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

McDiarmid Sheryl, Scrivens Nicholas, Carrier Marc, Sabri Elham, Toye Baldwin, Huebsch Lothar, Fergusson Dean

机构信息

Affiliations: The Ottawa Hospital (McDiarmid), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (McDiarmid, Scrivens, Sabri); Department of Medicine (Carrier), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute at the University of Ottawa; Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (Toye), University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital; Department of Medicine (Huebsch), University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital; Clinical Epidemiology Program (Fergusson), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; Department of Medicine (Fergusson), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.

出版信息

CMAJ Open. 2017 Jun 30;5(3):E535-E539. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20170010.

DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20170010
PMID:28676535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5621949/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) provide enormous benefit to patients. However, recent publications have highlighted relatively high PICC-associated complication rates. We report on patient and device outcomes from a nurse-led program.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospective cohort of consecutive patients undergoing PICC insertion at The Ottawa Hospital between Jan. 1, 2013 and Dec. 31, 2014. Of the 8314 BioFlo PASV PICCs inserted, we randomly selected a sample of 700 and obtained a complete data set for 656. We measured the cumulative incidence of major complications (catheter-related bloodstream infections and deep vein thrombosis) and use of a thrombolytic to alleviate occlusions.

RESULTS

The total number of catheter days was 58 486, and the median dwell time 45 days. We observed 4 cases of catheter-related bloodstream infection (0.6% [95% CI 0.17%-1.55%]) (0.07/1000 catheter days). Ten patients (1.5% [95% CI 0.83%-2.78%]) (0.17/1000 catheter days) had catheter-related deep venous thrombosis. At least 1 dose of thrombolytic was required in 75 catheters (11.4% [95% CI 8.61%-13.39]), 31 (7.1%) of the 436 single-lumen catheters and 113 (25.7%) of the 440 lumina of dual-lumen catheters ( < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

We attribute our low rates of major complications to a nurse-led expert insertion team, standardized care and maintenance protocols, high insertion volumes, novel catheter material and continuous quality-improvement initiatives that are implemented and evaluated regularly. We conclude that the considerable benefits PICCs provide to patients are attained with a low risk of major complications.

摘要

背景

经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)给患者带来了巨大益处。然而,近期的出版物强调了PICC相关并发症的发生率相对较高。我们报告了一项由护士主导的项目的患者和设备结局。

方法

我们对2013年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间在渥太华医院连续接受PICC置入的前瞻性队列患者进行了回顾性分析。在8314根插入的BioFlo PASV PICC中,我们随机抽取了700个样本,并获得了656个的完整数据集。我们测量了主要并发症(导管相关血流感染和深静脉血栓形成)的累积发生率以及使用溶栓剂缓解堵塞的情况。

结果

导管总天数为58486天,中位留置时间为45天。我们观察到4例导管相关血流感染(0.6%[95%CI 0.17%-1.55%])(0.07/1000导管日)。10例患者(1.5%[95%CI 0.83%-2.78%])(0.17/1000导管日)发生了导管相关深静脉血栓形成。75根导管(11.4%[95%CI 8.61%-13.39])需要至少一剂溶栓剂,436根单腔导管中的31根(7.1%)和440根双腔导管中的113根(25.7%)(<0.001)。

解读

我们将主要并发症发生率低归因于由护士主导的专业置入团队、标准化的护理和维护方案、高置入量、新型导管材料以及定期实施和评估的持续质量改进措施。我们得出结论,PICC给患者带来的巨大益处是在主要并发症风险较低的情况下实现的。