Jalovaara P, Kiviniemi H, Ståhlberg M
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1985;74(5):228-32.
A double-blind study of 43 patients undergoing excision of haemorrhoids under spinal anaesthesia was carried out to compare the analgesic effects of diflunisal (DFL, 21 patients) and dextropropoxyphene napsylate (DPN, 22 patients) on post-operative pain. Eleven patients (25%) reported no significant pain during the study indicating that they had needed no analgesic medication (4 in the DFL group and 7 in the DPN group). Thus 17 patients in the DFL group and 15 patients in the DPN group contributed to the analysis data. Seven patients in the DFL group and 9 patients in the DPN group needed additional analgesic therapy on the day of surgery. After the day of surgery the analgesic effect of both of the test medications was sufficient but DFL proved to provide slightly better pain relief than DPN. Two patients in each study group had mild adverse reactions including vomiting and epigastric pain, which were probably drug related. It is concluded that both DFL and DPN are safe and sufficiently effective treatments for pain after haemorrhoidectomy but not until one day after surgery.
对43例接受脊髓麻醉下痔疮切除术的患者进行了一项双盲研究,以比较双氟尼酸(DFL,21例患者)和萘磺酸右丙氧芬(DPN,22例患者)对术后疼痛的镇痛效果。11例患者(25%)在研究期间报告无明显疼痛,表明他们无需使用镇痛药物(DFL组4例,DPN组7例)。因此,DFL组的17例患者和DPN组的15例患者纳入分析数据。DFL组7例患者和DPN组9例患者在手术当天需要额外的镇痛治疗。手术后,两种受试药物的镇痛效果均足够,但DFL的止痛效果略优于DPN。每个研究组各有2例患者出现轻度不良反应,包括呕吐和上腹部疼痛,这些不良反应可能与药物有关。结论是,DFL和DPN都是痔疮切除术后疼痛的安全且有效治疗方法,但直到术后一天才有效。