• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估伦敦路径项目的影响。

Evaluating the impact of the London Pathway Project.

作者信息

Jolliffe Darrick, Cattell Jack, Raza Annabelle, Minoudis Philip

机构信息

Centre for Criminology, University of Greenwich, Ringgold Standard Institution, London, SE10 9LS, UK.

Get the Data, London, UK.

出版信息

Crim Behav Ment Health. 2017 Jul;27(3):238-253. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2041.

DOI:10.1002/cbm.2041
PMID:28677902
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The London Pathway Project (LPP) is an innovative whole-systems approach to addressing the needs of offenders who have severe personality disorder, with the goal of reducing their risk of harm. Previous research has evaluated the initial implementation of the LPP.

AIMS

This paper focused on evaluating the impact of the LPP on a number of criminogenic needs over time and its impact on the risk of reoffending and harm compared with a similar group who did not experience the pathway.

METHOD

Data for men who had been identified for the LPP were used to explore changes in key criminogenic needs an average of 11 months after commencing on the pathway. In addition, Offender Assessment System data was used to match men who had experienced the LPP for at least 12 months to a comparison group on key demographic and criminal history variables. Changes in validated risk assessment devices and changes in practitioners' perception of risk were examined.

RESULTS

The LPP was associated with desirable within-individual change for most of the criminogenic needs explored. However, strong non-desirable changes in lifestyle and associates were also identified, but this was particularly the case for those sentenced to prison. When compared with a matched group, those identified for the pathway showed a significant reduction on an objective measure of risk of reoffending but were rated as having significantly increased risk of harm on the basis of practitioner's perceptions. There was no evidence that greater progression along the pathway was associated with greater benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first impact evaluation of the LPP, and the results were generally positive in terms of its relation to criminogenic needs and risks. Much more research that clearly links project inputs to actual behavioural outcomes, such as later reoffending, is needed.

IMPLICATIONS

This initial evaluation of the impact of the LPP could be used as baseline data to examine the impact of the pathway over time, and with greater precision (e.g. matching on personality features). Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

摘要

背景

伦敦路径项目(LPP)是一种创新的全系统方法,旨在满足患有严重人格障碍的罪犯的需求,目标是降低他们造成伤害的风险。先前的研究已经评估了LPP的初步实施情况。

目的

本文重点评估LPP随着时间推移对一系列犯罪成因需求的影响,以及与未经历该路径的类似群体相比,其对再次犯罪和造成伤害风险的影响。

方法

使用已被确定参与LPP的男性的数据,探讨他们在开始该路径平均11个月后关键犯罪成因需求的变化。此外,利用罪犯评估系统的数据,将至少经历LPP 12个月的男性与一个在关键人口统计学和犯罪历史变量方面的对照组进行匹配。研究了经过验证的风险评估工具的变化以及从业者对风险认知的变化。

结果

对于所探讨的大多数犯罪成因需求,LPP与个体内部的理想变化相关。然而,也发现了生活方式和社交关系方面强烈的不良变化,尤其是那些被判处监禁的人。与匹配组相比,被确定参与该路径的人在再次犯罪风险的客观衡量指标上显著降低,但根据从业者的认知,他们被评定为造成伤害的风险显著增加。没有证据表明沿着该路径取得更大进展会带来更大益处。

结论

这是对LPP的首次影响评估,就其与犯罪成因需求和风险的关系而言,结果总体上是积极的。需要更多将项目投入与实际行为结果(如后来的再次犯罪)明确联系起来的研究。

启示

对LPP影响的这一初步评估可作为基线数据,用于随着时间推移更精确地研究该路径的影响(例如根据人格特征进行匹配)。版权所有© 2017约翰·威利父子有限公司。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the impact of the London Pathway Project.评估伦敦路径项目的影响。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2017 Jul;27(3):238-253. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2041.
2
Factors associated with progression in the London pathway project.
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2017 Jul;27(3):222-237. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2035.
3
Psychologically informed practice (PIP) for staff working with offenders with personality disorder: A pragmatic exploratory trial in approved premises.针对为患有人格障碍的罪犯提供服务的工作人员的心理知情实践(PIP):在核准场所进行的务实探索性试验。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2017 Oct;27(4):290-302. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1994. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
4
Evaluation of the Impact Personality Disorder Project - A psychologically-informed consultation, training and mental health collaboration approach to probation offender management.人格障碍项目影响评估——一种基于心理知识的咨询、培训及心理健康合作方式,用于缓刑罪犯管理。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2016 Jul;26(3):186-95. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1965. Epub 2015 May 28.
5
Processes of change in an offender personality disorder pathway prison progression unit.罪犯人格障碍路径监狱进阶单元中的改变过程。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2017 Jul;27(3):254-264. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2032.
6
Community DSPD pilot services in South London: rates of reconviction and impact of supported housing on reducing recidivism.伦敦南部社区延迟睡眠时相障碍试点服务:再定罪率及支持性住房对减少累犯的影响
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2014 Apr;24(2):129-40. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1892. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
7
The London Pathways Project: evaluating the effectiveness of a consultation model for personality disordered offenders.伦敦路径项目:评估针对人格障碍罪犯的咨询模式的有效性。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2012 Jul;22(3):218-32. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1831.
8
Agreement over content of case formulation in offender personality disorder pathway prison services.罪犯人格障碍治疗路径监狱服务中病例制定内容的一致性。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2020 Jun;30(2-3):105-116. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2148. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
9
"Who needs secure services for personality disorder?" Results of an expert Delphi study with professional staff.“谁需要人格障碍的安全服务?”一项专业人员专家德尔菲研究的结果。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 10;19(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2268-3.
10
Psychologically informed practice (PIP) within the offender personality disorder pathway: Towards establishing an evidence base for approved premises.罪犯人格障碍治疗途径中的心理知情实践(PIP):迈向为核准场所建立证据基础
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2020 Oct;30(5):268-280. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2165. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Does psychological support, training and guidance for probation practitioners lead to improved outcomes for service users and staff? A systematic review of Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) Pathway community delivery.对缓刑从业者的心理支持、培训和指导能否改善服务对象及工作人员的成果?对罪犯人格障碍(OPD)路径社区服务的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 13;20(2):e0318428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318428. eCollection 2025.