Smith Jennifer A, Zhao Wei, Wang Xu, Ratliff Scott M, Mukherjee Bhramar, Kardia Sharon L R, Liu Yongmei, Roux Ava V Diez, Needham Belinda L
a Department of Epidemiology , School of Public Health, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
b Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
Epigenetics. 2017 Aug;12(8):662-673. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2017.1341026. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
Living in a disadvantaged neighborhood is associated with poor health outcomes even after accounting for individual-level socioeconomic factors. The chronic stress of unfavorable neighborhood conditions may lead to dysregulation of the stress reactivity and inflammatory pathways, potentially mediated through epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation. We used multi-level models to examine the relationship between 2 neighborhood conditions and methylation levels of 18 genes related to stress reactivity and inflammation in purified monocytes from 1,226 participants of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), a population-based sample of US adults. Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage, a summary of 16 census-based metrics, was associated with DNA methylation [False discovery rate (FDR) q-value ≤ 0.1] in 2 out of 7 stress-related genes evaluated (CRF, SLC6A4) and 2 out of 11 inflammation-related genes (F8, TLR1). Neighborhood social environment, a summary measure of aesthetic quality, safety, and social cohesion, was associated with methylation in 4 of the 7 stress-related genes (AVP, BDNF, FKBP5, SLC6A4) and 7 of the 11 inflammation-related genes (CCL1, CD1D, F8, KLRG1, NLRP12, SLAMF7, TLR1). High socioeconomic disadvantage and worse social environment were primarily associated with increased methylation. In 5 genes with significant associations between neighborhood and methylation (FKBP5, CD1D, F8, KLRG1, NLRP12), methylation was associated with gene expression of at least one transcript. These results demonstrate that multiple dimensions of neighborhood context may influence methylation levels and subsequent gene expression of stress- and inflammation-related genes, even after accounting for individual socioeconomic factors. Further elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying these relationships will be important for understanding the etiology of health disparities.
即使在考虑了个体层面的社会经济因素之后,生活在弱势社区仍与健康状况不佳有关。不利的社区环境所带来的慢性压力可能会导致应激反应和炎症通路的失调,这可能是通过DNA甲基化等表观遗传机制介导的。我们使用多层次模型,研究了美国成年人基于人群的动脉粥样硬化多民族研究(MESA)中1226名参与者的两种社区环境与纯化单核细胞中18个与应激反应和炎症相关基因的甲基化水平之间的关系。社区社会经济劣势是基于16项人口普查指标的汇总,在评估的7个与应激相关基因中的2个(促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子、溶质载体家族6成员4)以及11个与炎症相关基因中的2个(凝血因子VIII、Toll样受体1)中,与DNA甲基化相关[错误发现率(FDR)q值≤0.1]。社区社会环境是对审美质量、安全性和社会凝聚力的综合衡量指标,在7个与应激相关基因中的4个(血管加压素、脑源性神经营养因子、FK506结合蛋白5、溶质载体家族6成员4)以及11个与炎症相关基因中的7个(C-C基序趋化因子配体1、CD1d分子、凝血因子VIII、杀伤细胞凝集素样受体G1、NLR家族pyrin结构域包含12、信号淋巴细胞激活分子家族成员7、Toll样受体1)中,与甲基化相关。高社会经济劣势和较差的社会环境主要与甲基化增加有关。在社区与甲基化之间存在显著关联的5个基因(FK506结合蛋白5、CD1d分子、凝血因子VIII、杀伤细胞凝集素样受体G1、NLR家族pyrin结构域包含12)中,甲基化与至少一种转录本的基因表达相关。这些结果表明,即使在考虑了个体社会经济因素之后,社区环境的多个维度仍可能影响与应激和炎症相关基因的甲基化水平以及随后的基因表达。进一步阐明这些关系背后的分子机制对于理解健康差异的病因至关重要。