Masic Izet, Begic Edin, Begic Nedim
Faculty of Medicine, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;238:246-249.
The aim of this paper is to point out the errors in scientometric analysis of an author's work, as well as the inconsistency of Google Scholars when performing such analyzes. Development of information technology has led to the development of the scientometric analyzes, which already have great significance for many decisions in the academic medical community, and represents a cross section of work of an author. Scientometric indices in the medical community become a tool in selecting the management of institutions, as well as membership in many academies. This paper should be a basis, as well as guidance in the development of a better and more accurate algorithm for more accurate analysis of the work of authors, and should also point the importance of accurate citations during writing scientific papers. The lack of selectivity of Google Scholar, and the possible individual manipulation of content, implies the need for further development of these platforms, so that the scientometric analysis can become a valid tool in the academic community.
本文旨在指出作者作品科学计量分析中的错误，以及谷歌学术在进行此类分析时的不一致性。信息技术的发展推动了科学计量分析的发展，科学计量分析对学术医学界的许多决策已具有重要意义，并且代表了作者的工作全貌。医学领域的科学计量指标成为机构管理选拔以及许多学术团体成员资格选拔的工具。本文应成为开发更好、更准确算法以更精确分析作者作品的基础和指南，还应指出在撰写科学论文时准确引用的重要性。谷歌学术缺乏选择性以及可能存在的内容人为操纵问题，意味着需要进一步开发这些平台，以便科学计量分析能够成为学术界的有效工具。
