Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Surgery and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;24(9):2744-2751. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5975-3. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
Receipt of 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is standard of care in pancreatic cancer (PC). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is increasingly utilized; however, optimal number of cycles needed alone or in combination with AC remains unknown. We sought to determine the optimal number and sequence of perioperative chemotherapy cycles in PC.
Single institutional review of all resected PCs from 2008 to 2015. The impact of cumulative number of chemotherapy cycles received (0, 1-5, and ≥6 cycles) and their sequence (NAC, AC, or NAC + AC) on overall survival was evaluated Cox-proportional hazard modeling, using 6 cycles of AC as reference.
A total of 522 patients were analyzed. Based on sample size distribution, four combinations were evaluated: 0 cycles = 12.1%, 1-5 cycles of combined NAC + AC = 29%, 6 cycles of AC = 25%, and ≥6 cycles of combined NAC + AC = 34%, with corresponding survival. 13.1, 18.5, 37, and 36.8 months. On MVA (P < 0.0001), tumor stage [hazard ratio (HR) 1.35], LNR (HR 4.3), and R1 margins (HR 1.77) were associated with increased hazard of death. Compared with 6 cycles AC, receipt of 0 cycles [HR 3.57, confidence interval (CI) 2.47-5.18] or 1-5 cycles in any combination (HR 2.37, CI 1.73-3.23) was associated with increased hazard of death, whereas receipt of ≥6 cycles in any sequence was associated with optimal and comparable survival (HR 1.07, CI 0.78-1.47).
Receipt of 6 or more perioperative cycles of chemotherapy either as combined neoadjuvant and adjuvant or adjuvant alone may be associated with optimal and comparable survival in resected PC.
在胰腺癌(PC)中,接受 6 个周期的辅助化疗(AC)是标准治疗方法。新辅助化疗(NAC)的应用越来越广泛;然而,单独或联合 AC 需要的最佳周期数仍不清楚。我们旨在确定 PC 围手术期化疗周期的最佳数量和顺序。
对 2008 年至 2015 年间所有接受手术治疗的 PC 患者进行单机构回顾。使用 Cox 比例风险模型评估接受的化疗周期总数(0、1-5 和≥6 个周期)及其顺序(NAC、AC 或 NAC+AC)对总生存的影响,以 6 个周期的 AC 为参照。
共分析了 522 例患者。根据样本量分布,评估了四种组合:0 个周期=12.1%、1-5 个周期联合 NAC+AC=29%、6 个周期 AC=25%和≥6 个周期联合 NAC+AC=34%,相应的生存时间为 13.1、18.5、37 和 36.8 个月。多变量分析(P<0.0001)显示,肿瘤分期[风险比(HR)1.35]、淋巴结转移率(LNR)(HR 4.3)和 R1 切缘(HR 1.77)与死亡风险增加相关。与 6 个周期的 AC 相比,接受 0 个周期(HR 3.57,95%置信区间[CI] 2.47-5.18)或任何组合中 1-5 个周期(HR 2.37,95%CI 1.73-3.23)与死亡风险增加相关,而接受任何序列中的≥6 个周期与最佳和可比生存相关(HR 1.07,95%CI 0.78-1.47)。
在接受手术治疗的 PC 患者中,接受 6 个或更多围手术期周期的化疗,无论是联合新辅助和辅助化疗还是辅助化疗,可能与最佳和可比的生存相关。