Rieser Caroline J, Zenati Mazen, Narayanan Sowmya, Bahary Nathan, Lee Kenneth K, Paniccia Alessandro, Bartlett David L, Zureikat Amer H
Division of GI Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Pancreatic Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Department of Surgery and Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):6264-6272. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09822-1. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is a growing strategy for patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Elderly patients are at increased risk of treatment withdrawal due to functional decline, and the benefit of NAT in this cohort remains to be studied.
The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of elderly patients with resectable head PDAC who underwent NAT or a surgery-first (SF) approach.
All patients 75 years of age and older with radiographically resectable (National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria) PDAC who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at a single institution from 2008 to 2017 were analyzed. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared between the SF and NAT cohorts. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by treatment strategy.
Overall, 158 patients were identified: SF cohort = 90 (57%) and NAT cohort = 68 (43%). Patients in the SF cohort were older (80 vs. 78 years; p = 0.01) but there were no differences in preoperative comorbidities or frailty indices. SF patients had a trend toward higher rates of major complications (38% vs. 24%; p = 0.06) with higher Comprehensive Complication Index totals (20.9 vs. 20; p = 0.03). There were similar rates of adjuvant therapy. NAT was associated with significantly longer OS (24.6 vs. 17.6 months; p = 0.01) in both the intent-to-treat and resected cohorts. On multivariable analysis (MVA), NAT remained an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio 0.60; p = 0.02).
NAT is safe and effective for elderly patients with PDAC. This study suggests NAT is associated with fewer complications after surgery, equal rates of adjuvant therapy receipt, and increased OS over a surgery-first approach.
新辅助治疗(NAT)是可切除胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者中一种日益常用的治疗策略。老年患者因功能衰退而中断治疗的风险增加,NAT在这一队列中的获益仍有待研究。
本研究的目的是比较接受NAT或先手术(SF)治疗的可切除胰头PDAC老年患者的治疗结果。
分析了2008年至2017年在单一机构接受胰十二指肠切除术的所有75岁及以上、影像学检查可切除(符合美国国立综合癌症网络标准)的PDAC患者。比较了SF组和NAT组的基线特征和围手术期结果。按治疗策略分析无复发生存期和总生存期(OS)。
总共确定了158例患者:SF组=90例(57%),NAT组=68例(43%)。SF组患者年龄更大(80岁对78岁;p=0.01),但术前合并症或衰弱指数无差异。SF组患者发生严重并发症的比例有升高趋势(38%对24%;p=0.06),综合并发症指数总分更高(20.9对20;p=0.03)。辅助治疗的比例相似。在意向性治疗队列和切除队列中,NAT均与显著更长的OS相关(24.6个月对17.6个月;p=0.01)。多变量分析(MVA)显示,NAT仍然是OS的独立预测因素(风险比0.60;p=0.02)。
NAT对老年PDAC患者安全有效。本研究表明,与先手术方法相比,NAT术后并发症更少,辅助治疗接受率相当,且OS延长。