Seven Ibrahim, Vahdati Ali, Pedersen Iben Bach, Vestergaard Anders, Hjortdal Jesper, Roberts Cynthia J, Dupps William J
J Refract Surg. 2017 Jul 1;33(7):444-453. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170504-01.
Computational analyses were performed to quantify and directly compare the biomechanical impact of flapless and flap-based procedures in a series of patients undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in one eye and flap-based femtosecond lenticule extraction in the other.
Tomographic data from 10 eyes of 5 patients undergoing femtosecond laser refractive lenticule extraction for myopic astigmatism with or without a stromal flap (femtosecond lenticule extraction in one eye, SMILE in the contralateral eye) were used to generate computational models. Inverse finite element analyses were performed at physiologic intraocular pressure followed by forward analyses at elevated intraocular pressure to assess corneal displacement and stress under differential loading. Case-specific treatment settings were incorporated. Preoperative material constants were obtained through inverse finite element analyses, and the surgically induced change in fiber stiffness within each flap was determined by minimization of the error between the simulated and actual 6-month topographic outcomes.
Flap-based procedures produced a 49% (range: 2% to 87%) greater mean reduction in effective stromal collagen fiber stiffness within the flap region than contralateral SMILE cases. Lower stresses and deformations were observed within the residual stromal bed in SMILE cases than in flap-based cases. Stromal bed displacements and stresses were more affected by a loading increase in flap-based eyes than flapless eyes.
Intrastromal flapless procedures had less impact on anterior stromal collagen mechanics and resulted in lower stromal bed displacements and stresses than flap-based procedures in contralateral eyes. However, biomechanical impact varied widely between individuals and this reinforces the need for individualized assessment of ectasia risk. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(7):444-453].
进行计算分析,以量化并直接比较无瓣手术和有瓣手术对一系列患者的生物力学影响,这些患者一只眼睛接受小切口透镜切除术(SMILE),另一只眼睛接受有瓣飞秒透镜切除术。
使用5例接受飞秒激光屈光透镜切除术治疗近视散光(有或无基质瓣,一只眼睛行飞秒透镜切除术,对侧眼睛行SMILE)患者的10只眼睛的断层扫描数据来生成计算模型。在生理眼压下进行逆有限元分析,然后在升高的眼压下进行正向分析,以评估不同负荷下的角膜位移和应力。纳入了特定病例的治疗参数。通过逆有限元分析获得术前材料常数,并通过最小化模拟和实际6个月地形图结果之间的误差来确定每个瓣内手术引起的纤维刚度变化。
与对侧SMILE病例相比,有瓣手术在瓣区域内有效基质胶原纤维刚度的平均降低幅度大49%(范围:2%至87%)。与有瓣手术病例相比,SMILE病例的残余基质床内观察到更低的应力和变形。与无瓣眼睛相比,有瓣眼睛的负荷增加对基质床位移和应力的影响更大。
与对侧眼睛的有瓣手术相比,基质内无瓣手术对前基质胶原力学的影响较小,并且导致更低的基质床位移和应力。然而,个体之间的生物力学影响差异很大,这强化了对扩张风险进行个体化评估的必要性。[《屈光手术杂志》。2017;33(7):444 - 453]