Vishnu Prakash, Wingerson Andrew, Lee Marie, Mandelson Margaret T, Aboulafia David M
Floyd and Delores Jones Cancer Institute at Virginia Mason Medical Centre, Seattle, WA.
Department of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017 Oct;17(10):631-636. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
About one-third of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have lymphomatous bone marrow involvement (BMI) at the time of diagnosis, and bone marrow aspirate/biopsy (BMAB) is considered the gold standard to detect such involvement. [F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT), has become standard pretreatment imaging in DLBCL and may be a noninvasive alternative to BMAB to ascertain BMI. Prior studies have suggested that PET-CT scan may obviate the need for BMAB as a component for staging patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL, but this is not yet a standard of practice. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the accuracy of PET-CT in detecting BMI in DLBCL and to define 2-year and 5-year overall survival based on BMI by BMAB versus PET-CT.
We reviewed institutional records of all patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL between January 2004 and December 2013 who underwent pretreatment PET-CT and BMAB. PET-CT images were visually assessed for BMI, including the posterior iliac crest. Patients with primary mediastinal DLBCL, previous history or coexistence of another lymphoma subtype, and those with a nondiagnostic BMAB, and in whom the PET-CT did not show marrow signal abnormality, were excluded from the analysis. Ann Arbor stage was determined using PET-CT with and without the contribution of BMAB, and the proportion of stage IV cases by each method was measured.
Among 99 eligible patients, the median age was 62 years (range, 24-88 years), 62 (63%) were male, 53 (53%) had elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase, and 17 (16%) had an Eastern Community Oncology Group performance status of > 2. Thirteen (12%) patients had more than 1 extra-nodal site of lymphoma involvement. Revised International Prognostic Index score was 1 in 39 (37%) patients, 2 in 42 (40%) patients, 3 in 20 (19%) patients, and 4 in 4 (4%) patients. A total of 38 (36%) patients had BMI established by either PET-CT (n = 24; 24%), BMAB (n = 14; 14%), or by both modalities (n = 12; 12%). Twelve (50%) of the 24 patients with positive PET-CT had BMI by DLBCL, whereas only 2 (3%) of the 75 patients with negative PET-CT showed BMI. BMAB upstaged 1 (2%) of the 53 stage I/II patients to stage IV. The sensitivity and specificity of PET-CT scan to detect BMI by DLBCL was 86% (95% confidence interval, 51.9%-95.7%) and 87% (95% confidence interval, 76%-92%), respectively. Eighty-five (86%) patients had concordant results between lymphomatous BMAB and PET-CT (12 patients were positive for both; 73 patients were negative for both), and 14 (14%) patients had a discordant interpretation (2 patients were positive by BMAB and negative by PET-CT, and 12 patients were negative by BMAB and positive by PET-CT). The positive predictive value of PET-CT was only 50%, whereas the negative predictive value was 98%. The accuracy of PET-CT was 86%. Although patients with positive BMAB had inferior 5-year overall survival estimates compared with those with negative BMAB (66% vs. 85%; P = .08), no such difference was demonstrated between PET-CT-positive and PET-CT-negative patients (79% vs. 83%; P = .30).
In patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL, PET-CT is accurate in detecting BMI by DLBCL. Although PET-CT has a very high negative predictive value for BMI, it overestimates the number of cases with marrow involvement by DLBCL. In clinical practice, routine BMAB may no longer be necessary for all patients with DLBCL who are staged by PET-CT, unless the results would change both staging and therapy. The prognostic implication of BMI identified by PET-CT compared with BMAB remains unknown. Whether a PET-CT precludes the need for a BMAB in patients with DLBCL remains to be evaluated in a prospective study.
约三分之一的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者在诊断时存在淋巴瘤骨髓浸润(BMI),骨髓穿刺/活检(BMAB)被认为是检测此类浸润的金标准。[F]氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描联合计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)已成为DLBCL的标准预处理成像方法,可能是一种用于确定BMI的替代BMAB的非侵入性方法。先前的研究表明,PET-CT扫描可能无需进行BMAB作为新诊断DLBCL患者分期的一个组成部分,但这尚未成为一种标准做法。这项回顾性研究的目的是确定PET-CT在检测DLBCL中BMI的准确性,并根据BMAB与PET-CT检测的BMI定义2年和5年总生存率。
我们回顾了2004年1月至2013年12月期间所有接受预处理PET-CT和BMAB的新诊断DLBCL患者的机构记录。对PET-CT图像进行目视评估以确定BMI,包括髂后嵴。原发性纵隔DLBCL患者、有其他淋巴瘤亚型既往史或并存其他淋巴瘤亚型的患者、BMAB诊断不明确的患者以及PET-CT未显示骨髓信号异常的患者被排除在分析之外。使用PET-CT确定Ann Arbor分期,包括有无BMAB的贡献,并测量每种方法的IV期病例比例。
99例符合条件的患者中,中位年龄为62岁(范围24 - 88岁),62例(63%)为男性,53例(53%)血清乳酸脱氢酶升高,17例(16%)东部肿瘤协作组体能状态>2。13例(12%)患者有超过1个结外淋巴瘤累及部位。修订后的国际预后指数评分为1分的患者有39例(37%),2分的患者有42例(40%),3分的患者有20例(19%),4分的患者有4例(4%)。共有38例(36%)患者通过PET-CT(n = 24;24%)、BMAB(n = 14;14%)或两种方法(n = 12;12%)确定有BMI。PET-CT阳性的24例患者中有12例(50%)经DLBCL诊断有BMI,而PET-CT阴性的75例患者中只有2例(3%)显示有BMI。BMAB将53例I/II期患者中的1例(2%)上调至IV期。PET-CT扫描检测DLBCL所致BMI的敏感性和特异性分别为86%(95%置信区间,51.9% - 95.7%)和87%(95%置信区间,76% - 92%)。85例(86%)患者的淋巴瘤BMAB和PET-CT结果一致(12例两者均为阳性;73例两者均为阴性),14例(14%)患者的解读不一致(2例BMAB阳性而PET-CT阴性,12例BMAB阴性而PET-CT阳性)。PET-CT的阳性预测值仅为50%,而阴性预测值为98%。PET-CT的准确性为86%。虽然BMAB阳性的患者5年总生存率估计低于BMAB阴性的患者(66%对85%;P = 0.08),但PET-CT阳性和PET-CT阴性患者之间未显示出这种差异(79%对83%;P = 0.30)。
在新诊断的DLBCL患者中,PET-CT在检测DLBCL所致BMI方面是准确的。虽然PET-CT对BMI有非常高的阴性预测值,但它高估了DLBCL骨髓浸润的病例数。在临床实践中,对于所有通过PET-CT分期的DLBCL患者,常规BMAB可能不再必要,除非结果会改变分期和治疗。与BMAB相比,PET-CT确定的BMI的预后意义尚不清楚。PET-CT是否能使DLBCL患者无需进行BMAB仍有待在前瞻性研究中评估。