Suppr超能文献

当代临床分期为 IS 的睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤的治疗模式和结局。

Contemporary Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Clinical Stage IS Testicular Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Division of Urological Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2018 Feb;73(2):262-270. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jul 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the optimal management strategy for clinical stage IS seminomatous (SGCT) and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) of the testis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess contemporary treatment patterns and outcomes for clinical stage IS testicular cancer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using the National Cancer Data Base (2004-2012), we identified 1362 patients with clinical stage IS SGCT and NSGCT of the testis, treated with either adjuvant treatment (AT) or observation.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We calculated the annual percent change (APC) to assess treatment trends. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses were used to compare overall survival (OS) between AT and observation groups. Analyses were stratified by histologic type.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Overall, there were 581 (43%) and 781 (57%) men with SGCT and NSGCT, respectively. Among men with SGCT, the use of AT decreased over the study period (APC=-2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.4, -1.1, p=0.001). The 5-yr IPTW-adjusted rates of OS were 99% and 97% in the AT and observation groups, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.12, 1.14, p=0.08). Among men with NSGCT, the use of AT remained stable over the study period (APC = +0.8, 95% CI: -0.7, +2.2, p=0.29). The 5-yr IPTW-adjusted rates of OS were 97% and 95% in the AT and observation groups, respectively (HR=0.66, 95% CI: 0.27, 1.61, p=0.36). Limitations include the lack of full treatment details and cancer-specific survival information.

CONCLUSIONS

Trends in the use of AT significantly decreased over time for SGCT, while it remained stable for NSGCT. Nonetheless, we report 5-yr OS rates of ≥95% for both histologies without any significant benefit with the use of AT. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We evaluated treatment trends and outcomes for stage IS testicular cancer. We found that treatment changed over time for seminoma and remained stable for nonseminoma; there was no significant survival benefit in the use of adjuvant treatment versus observation for both seminomatous and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors.

摘要

背景

对于临床 I 期精原细胞瘤(SGCT)和非精原细胞瘤生殖细胞肿瘤(NSGCT)的最佳治疗策略存在争议。

目的

评估临床 I 期睾丸癌的当代治疗模式和结局。

设计、设置和参与者:使用国家癌症数据库(2004-2012 年),我们确定了 1362 名患有临床 I 期 SGCT 和 NSGCT 的睾丸生殖细胞肿瘤患者,他们接受了辅助治疗(AT)或观察治疗。

结局测量和统计分析

我们计算了每年的百分比变化(APC),以评估治疗趋势。使用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)调整的 Kaplan-Meier 曲线和 Cox 回归分析比较了 AT 组和观察组的总生存率(OS)。按组织学类型进行分层分析。

结果和局限性

总体而言,分别有 581 名(43%)和 781 名(57%)男性患有 SGCT 和 NSGCT。在 SGCT 患者中,AT 的使用在研究期间减少(APC=-2.7,95%置信区间[CI]:-4.4,-1.1,p=0.001)。AT 组和观察组的 5 年 IPTW 调整 OS 率分别为 99%和 97%(危险比=0.36,95%CI:0.12,1.14,p=0.08)。在 NSGCT 患者中,AT 的使用在研究期间保持稳定(APC=+0.8,95%CI:-0.7,+2.2,p=0.29)。AT 组和观察组的 5 年 IPTW 调整 OS 率分别为 97%和 95%(HR=0.66,95%CI:0.27,1.61,p=0.36)。局限性包括缺乏完整的治疗细节和癌症特异性生存信息。

结论

SGCT 的 AT 使用趋势随时间显著下降,而 NSGCT 的 AT 使用趋势保持稳定。尽管如此,我们报告了两种组织学类型的 5 年 OS 率均≥95%,而使用 AT 并未带来任何显著的生存获益。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。

患者总结

我们评估了临床 I 期睾丸癌的治疗趋势和结局。我们发现,SGCT 的治疗随时间而变化,而 NSGCT 的治疗则保持稳定;对于精原细胞瘤和非精原细胞瘤生殖细胞肿瘤,与观察相比,使用辅助治疗并没有显著的生存获益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验