Center for Healthy Communities, School of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California.
Institute for Medicaid Innovation, Washington, DC.
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Sep-Oct;27(5):573-578. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
Preterm birth is the leading cause of U.S. infant morbidity and mortality; Medicaid enrollees disproportionately experience preterm deliveries. Data suggest that progesterone-an evidence-based therapy for preventing preterm birth-is not accessible to all eligible Medicaid beneficiaries. This study aimed to identify variation in progesterone coverage guidelines in a sample of state Medicaid managed care organizations (MMCOs).
Using a cross-sectional design, participation in a web-based survey was offered to 20 MMCO members of the Medicaid Health Plans of America. The survey assessed coverage guidelines for progesterone and associated interventions to prevent preterm birth. MMCOs identified key barriers in providing progesterone. Descriptive analyses were performed.
Analyses included data from 18 plans providing coverage in 31 of the 39 states with MMCOs (response rate, 90.0%). Responding MMCOs were diverse: 55.6% were multistate, 33.3% were nonprofit, and 31.2% covered more than 1,000,000 lives. Most respondents (87.5%) covered branded progesterone, and 81.3% covered compounded progesterone. Prior authorization was required by most plans for branded progesterone (86.7%) or compounded progesterone (75.0%). The MMCO gestational age restrictions for initiating progesterone varied from 22 to 37 weeks of gestation, even within the same state. MMCO-identified barriers to providing progesterone included cost, lack of clinician knowledge of indications and coverage, and variation in billing procedures.
Marked variation in MMCO coverage policies and procedures for progesterone and related interventions to prevent preterm birth was noted.
Standardizing MMCO coverage policies may be one way to improve access to evidence-based interventions that prevent preterm birth.
早产是导致美国婴儿发病率和死亡率的主要原因;医疗补助计划的参保人早产的比例不成比例。有数据表明,孕酮——一种预防早产的循证疗法——并非所有符合条件的医疗补助计划受益人都能获得。本研究旨在确定美国医疗补助计划管理式医疗组织(MMCO)中孕酮覆盖指南的差异。
采用横断面设计,向美国医疗补助健康计划中的 20 个 MMCO 成员提供了一项基于网络的调查参与。该调查评估了孕酮的覆盖指南以及预防早产的相关干预措施。MMCO 确定了提供孕酮的主要障碍。进行了描述性分析。
分析包括来自 18 个提供覆盖的计划的数据,这些计划分布在有 MMCO 的 39 个州中的 31 个州(响应率为 90.0%)。参与的 MMCO 多种多样:55.6%是多州的,33.3%是非营利性的,31.2%覆盖了超过 100 万的生命。大多数受访者(87.5%)覆盖了品牌孕酮,81.3%覆盖了复合孕酮。大多数计划都需要对品牌孕酮(86.7%)或复合孕酮(75.0%)进行事先授权。MMCO 启动孕酮的妊娠年龄限制从 22 周到 37 周不等,即使在同一个州也是如此。MMCO 确定提供孕酮的障碍包括成本、临床医生对适应症和覆盖范围的了解不足以及计费程序的差异。
注意到 MMCO 对孕酮和预防早产的相关干预措施的覆盖政策和程序存在显著差异。
标准化 MMCO 覆盖政策可能是提高获得循证干预措施以预防早产的一种方法。