Suppr超能文献

医疗补助管理式医疗中阿片类药物使用障碍药物的覆盖范围和事先授权政策。

Coverage and Prior Authorization Policies for Medications for Opioid Use Disorder in Medicaid Managed Care.

机构信息

Department of Public Administration and Policy, University of Georgia School of Public and International Affairs, Athens.

Arnold School of Public Health, Health Services Policy and Management Department, University of South Carolina, Columbia.

出版信息

JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Nov 4;3(11):e224001. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.4001.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Medicaid is a key policy lever to improve opioid use disorder treatment, covering approximately 40% of Americans with opioid use disorder. Although approximately 70% of Medicaid beneficiaries are enrolled in comprehensive managed care organization (MCO) plans, little is known about coverage and prior authorization (PA) policies for medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in these plans.

OBJECTIVE

To compare coverage and PA policies for buprenorphine, methadone, and injectable naltrexone across Medicaid MCO plans and fee-for-service (FFS) programs and across states.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study analyzed MOUD data from 266 Medicaid MCO plans and FFS programs in 38 states and the District of Columbia in 2018.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

For each medication, the percentages of MCO plans and FFS programs that covered the medication without PA, covered the medication with PA, and did not cover the medication were calculated, as were the percentages of MCO, FFS, and all (MCO and FFS) beneficiaries who were covered with no PA, covered with PA, and not covered. In addition, MCO plan coverage and PA policies were mapped by state. Analyses were conducted from January 1 through May 31, 2022.

RESULTS

Coverage and PA policies were compared for MOUD in 266 MCO plans and 39 FFS programs, representing approximately 70 million Medicaid beneficiaries. Overall, FFS programs had more generous MOUD coverage than MCO plans. However, a higher percentage of FFS programs imposed PA for the 3 medications (47.0%) than did MCOs (35.9%). Furthermore, although most Medicaid beneficiaries were enrolled in a plan that covered MOUD, 53.2% of all MCO- and FFS-enrolled beneficiaries were subject to PA. Results also showed wide state variation in MCO plan coverage and PA policies for MOUD and the percentage of Medicaid beneficiaries subject to PA.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cross-sectional study found variation in MOUD coverage and PA policies across Medicaid MCO plans and FFS programs and across states. Thus, Medicaid beneficiaries' access to MOUD may be heavily influenced by their state of residency and the Medicaid plan in which they are enrolled. Left unaddressed, PA policies are likely to remain a barrier to MOUD access in the nation's Medicaid programs.

摘要

重要性

医疗补助是改善阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的关键政策杠杆,覆盖了大约 40%的阿片类药物使用障碍患者。尽管大约 70%的医疗补助受益人为综合性管理式医疗组织(MCO)计划所覆盖,但对于这些计划中治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)的药物的覆盖范围和事先授权(PA)政策知之甚少。

目的

比较医疗补助 MCO 计划和按服务收费(FFS)计划以及各州间丁丙诺啡、美沙酮和注射用纳曲酮的覆盖范围和 PA 政策。

设计、设置和参与者:这项横断面研究分析了 2018 年来自 38 个州和哥伦比亚特区的 266 个医疗补助 MCO 计划和 FFS 计划中的 MOUD 数据。

主要结果和措施

对于每种药物,计算了 MCO 计划和 FFS 计划不进行 PA 覆盖、进行 PA 覆盖和不覆盖药物的百分比,以及没有 PA 覆盖、有 PA 覆盖和未覆盖药物的 MCO、FFS 和所有(MCO 和 FFS)受益人的百分比。此外,按州映射 MCO 计划的覆盖范围和 PA 政策。分析于 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 5 月 31 日进行。

结果

比较了 266 个 MCO 计划和 39 个 FFS 计划中的 MOUD 覆盖范围和 PA 政策,代表了大约 7000 万医疗补助受益人群。总体而言,FFS 计划对 MOUD 的覆盖范围比 MCO 计划更为宽松。然而,与 MCO 相比,有更高比例的 FFS 计划对 3 种药物(47.0%)实施了 PA(35.9%)。此外,尽管大多数医疗补助受益人都参加了覆盖 MOUD 的计划,但所有 MCO 和 FFS 计划的受益人中有 53.2%需要进行 PA。结果还显示,在 MCO 计划对 MOUD 的覆盖范围和 PA 政策以及需要 PA 的医疗补助受益人的比例方面,各州之间存在很大差异。

结论和相关性

这项横断面研究发现,医疗补助 MCO 计划和 FFS 计划以及各州之间在 MOUD 的覆盖范围和 PA 政策方面存在差异。因此,医疗补助受益人的 MOUD 获得情况可能受到他们居住的州和参加的医疗补助计划的严重影响。如果不加以解决,PA 政策可能仍然是国家医疗补助计划中 MOUD 获得的障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07f6/10157383/28f38cee0c53/nihms-1891966-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验