Suppr超能文献

结直肠癌筛查方法的有效性:网络荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Institute of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China.

Center of Evidence-Based Medicine of Lanzhou University, Basic Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China; Medical School, Yale University, New Haven, CT.

出版信息

Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Dec;16(4):252-263. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate on the effectiveness of screening modalities in the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) occurrence and deaths. General meta-analysis was performed to produce pooled estimates of the effect of CRC incidence and mortality using a search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies from January 1992 to March 2016. A network meta-analysis was performed to synthetically compare the effectiveness of 5 frequently used screening modalities. A total of 44 studies with a focus on mortality from CRC using different screening methods were included. General meta-analysis showed that fecal immunohistochemical testing (FIT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), colonoscopy, combination of fecal occult blood testing and FS screening respectively reduced CRC mortality by 59% (relative risk [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.59), 33% (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58-0.78), 61% (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31-0.50), 38% (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91) compared with no screening, whereas guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) reduced CRC-related mortality by 14% (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90). Subgroup analysis showed that summary estimates of reduction in distal CRC mortality and proximal CRC mortality were 26% (95% CI, 62%-89%) and 10% (95% CI, 83%-98%). A network meta-analysis revealed rank probability analysis in which the colonoscopy had a 94.6% probability of being the most effective examination to reduce CRC mortality. In addition, the network meta-analysis estimated odds ratio, which was a 79% reduction (95% CI, 0.09-0.60) in CRC mortality when screening with FIT was compared with annual or biennial gFOBT and colonoscopy was approximately 80% more effective than gFOBT for reducing CRC mortality (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13-0.54). Analysis of the effects of different screening methods showed that there was a significant reduction in the incidence of colon cancer, excluding gFOBT. This meta-analysis confirmed that gFOBT, FIT, FS, and colonoscopy were all effective in preventing CRC deaths and a major reduction in distal but not proximal CRC mortality was found. In addition, they were more effective in preventing CRC incidence in addition to gFOBT. The network meta-analysis suggests that colonoscopy is the most effective screening for preventing CRC deaths.

摘要

本研究旨在评估筛查方法在预防结直肠癌(CRC)发生和死亡方面的有效性。通过检索 1992 年 1 月至 2016 年 3 月的 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆,对符合条件的研究进行综合分析,得出 CRC 发病率和死亡率的汇总估计值。进行网络荟萃分析以综合比较 5 种常用筛查方法的有效性。共纳入 44 项研究,这些研究采用不同的筛查方法,重点关注 CRC 死亡率。综合分析表明,粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)、乙状结肠镜检查(FS)、结肠镜检查、粪便潜血检测与 FS 联合筛查分别使 CRC 死亡率降低 59%(相对风险 [RR],0.41;95%置信区间 [CI],0.29-0.59)、33%(RR,0.67;95%CI,0.58-0.78)、61%(RR,0.39;95%CI,0.31-0.50)、38%(RR,0.62;95%CI,0.42-0.91),而愈创木脂粪便潜血检测(gFOBT)则使 CRC 相关死亡率降低 14%(RR,0.86;95%CI,0.82-0.90)。亚组分析显示,远端 CRC 死亡率和近端 CRC 死亡率降低的综合估计值分别为 26%(95%CI,62%-89%)和 10%(95%CI,83%-98%)。网络荟萃分析显示,结直肠镜检查降低 CRC 死亡率的可能性为 94.6%。此外,网络荟萃分析还估计了比值比,与每年或每两年进行一次 gFOBT 相比,FIT 筛查可使 CRC 死亡率降低 79%(95%CI,0.09-0.60),而结直肠镜检查比 gFOBT 降低 CRC 死亡率的效果约高 80%(RR,0.25;95%CI,0.13-0.54)。不同筛查方法效果分析显示,除 gFOBT 外,结直肠癌的发病率均显著降低。本荟萃分析证实,gFOBT、FIT、FS 和结肠镜检查均可有效预防 CRC 死亡,并且主要降低远端而非近端 CRC 死亡率。此外,它们在预防 CRC 发病方面比 gFOBT 更有效。网络荟萃分析表明,结肠镜检查是预防 CRC 死亡的最有效筛查方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验