Institute of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China.
Center of Evidence-Based Medicine of Lanzhou University, Basic Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China; Medical School, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Dec;16(4):252-263. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
The aim of the study was to evaluate on the effectiveness of screening modalities in the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) occurrence and deaths. General meta-analysis was performed to produce pooled estimates of the effect of CRC incidence and mortality using a search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies from January 1992 to March 2016. A network meta-analysis was performed to synthetically compare the effectiveness of 5 frequently used screening modalities. A total of 44 studies with a focus on mortality from CRC using different screening methods were included. General meta-analysis showed that fecal immunohistochemical testing (FIT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), colonoscopy, combination of fecal occult blood testing and FS screening respectively reduced CRC mortality by 59% (relative risk [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.59), 33% (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58-0.78), 61% (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31-0.50), 38% (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91) compared with no screening, whereas guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) reduced CRC-related mortality by 14% (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90). Subgroup analysis showed that summary estimates of reduction in distal CRC mortality and proximal CRC mortality were 26% (95% CI, 62%-89%) and 10% (95% CI, 83%-98%). A network meta-analysis revealed rank probability analysis in which the colonoscopy had a 94.6% probability of being the most effective examination to reduce CRC mortality. In addition, the network meta-analysis estimated odds ratio, which was a 79% reduction (95% CI, 0.09-0.60) in CRC mortality when screening with FIT was compared with annual or biennial gFOBT and colonoscopy was approximately 80% more effective than gFOBT for reducing CRC mortality (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13-0.54). Analysis of the effects of different screening methods showed that there was a significant reduction in the incidence of colon cancer, excluding gFOBT. This meta-analysis confirmed that gFOBT, FIT, FS, and colonoscopy were all effective in preventing CRC deaths and a major reduction in distal but not proximal CRC mortality was found. In addition, they were more effective in preventing CRC incidence in addition to gFOBT. The network meta-analysis suggests that colonoscopy is the most effective screening for preventing CRC deaths.
本研究旨在评估筛查方法在预防结直肠癌(CRC)发生和死亡方面的有效性。通过检索 1992 年 1 月至 2016 年 3 月的 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆,对符合条件的研究进行综合分析,得出 CRC 发病率和死亡率的汇总估计值。进行网络荟萃分析以综合比较 5 种常用筛查方法的有效性。共纳入 44 项研究,这些研究采用不同的筛查方法,重点关注 CRC 死亡率。综合分析表明,粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)、乙状结肠镜检查(FS)、结肠镜检查、粪便潜血检测与 FS 联合筛查分别使 CRC 死亡率降低 59%(相对风险 [RR],0.41;95%置信区间 [CI],0.29-0.59)、33%(RR,0.67;95%CI,0.58-0.78)、61%(RR,0.39;95%CI,0.31-0.50)、38%(RR,0.62;95%CI,0.42-0.91),而愈创木脂粪便潜血检测(gFOBT)则使 CRC 相关死亡率降低 14%(RR,0.86;95%CI,0.82-0.90)。亚组分析显示,远端 CRC 死亡率和近端 CRC 死亡率降低的综合估计值分别为 26%(95%CI,62%-89%)和 10%(95%CI,83%-98%)。网络荟萃分析显示,结直肠镜检查降低 CRC 死亡率的可能性为 94.6%。此外,网络荟萃分析还估计了比值比,与每年或每两年进行一次 gFOBT 相比,FIT 筛查可使 CRC 死亡率降低 79%(95%CI,0.09-0.60),而结直肠镜检查比 gFOBT 降低 CRC 死亡率的效果约高 80%(RR,0.25;95%CI,0.13-0.54)。不同筛查方法效果分析显示,除 gFOBT 外,结直肠癌的发病率均显著降低。本荟萃分析证实,gFOBT、FIT、FS 和结肠镜检查均可有效预防 CRC 死亡,并且主要降低远端而非近端 CRC 死亡率。此外,它们在预防 CRC 发病方面比 gFOBT 更有效。网络荟萃分析表明,结肠镜检查是预防 CRC 死亡的最有效筛查方法。