Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查和结肠胶囊内镜检查预期不适与实际不适之间差异的社会经济差异。

Socioeconomic differences in discrepancies between expected and experienced discomfort from colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy.

作者信息

Deding Ulrik, Bøggild Henrik, Kaalby Lasse, Hjelmborg Jacob, Kobaek-Larsen Morten, Thygesen Marianne Kirstine, Schelde-Olesen Benedicte, Bjørsum-Meyer Thomas, Baatrup Gunnar

机构信息

Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark.

Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jul 8;10(14):e34274. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34274. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation are evident. Barriers to screening participation include discomfort from diagnostic modalities. We aimed to describe the discomfort experienced from colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) and investigate the discrepancy between expected and experienced discomfort stratified by socioeconomic status.

METHODS

A randomised controlled trial was conducted offering half of the colorectal cancer screening invitees the choice between CCE and colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test. This paper includes those who elected to undergo CCE. A positive CCE elicited referral for a therapeutic colonoscopy. Participants reported their discomfort from CCE and from any following colonoscopies in electronically distributed questionnaires. Discomfort was measured using visual analogue scales and compared between socioeconomic subgroups determined by educational level and income.

RESULTS

The experienced discomfort from CCE and colonoscopy differed significantly between educational levels but not income levels. The bowel preparation contributed the most to the experienced discomfort in both CCE and colonoscopy. The discrepancy between expected and experienced discomfort from colonoscopy increased with increasing educational and income levels. A similar trend was seen in CCE between educational levels but not income levels.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the results indicated a higher discomfort in lower socioeconomic subgroups. Regardless of the investigation modality, the bowel preparation was the main contributor to experienced discomfort. The discrepancy between expected and experienced discomfort did not seem to be larger in lower socioeconomic subgroups, indicating that this is not a major barrier causing inequalities in screening uptake. This is the first study investigating individual discomfort discrepancy in both CCE and colonoscopy, while being able to stratify by socioeconomic status.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌筛查参与方面的社会不平等现象明显。筛查参与的障碍包括诊断方式带来的不适。我们旨在描述结肠镜检查和结肠胶囊内镜检查(CCE)所经历的不适,并调查按社会经济地位分层的预期不适与实际经历不适之间的差异。

方法

开展了一项随机对照试验,在粪便免疫化学检测呈阳性后,为一半的结直肠癌筛查受邀者提供CCE和结肠镜检查之间的选择。本文纳入了选择接受CCE的人群。CCE结果呈阳性者会被转诊进行治疗性结肠镜检查。参与者通过电子分发的问卷报告他们在CCE以及随后任何结肠镜检查中所经历的不适。使用视觉模拟量表测量不适程度,并在由教育水平和收入确定的社会经济亚组之间进行比较。

结果

CCE和结肠镜检查所经历的不适在教育水平之间存在显著差异,但在收入水平之间无显著差异。肠道准备对CCE和结肠镜检查中所经历的不适影响最大。结肠镜检查预期不适与实际经历不适之间的差异随着教育和收入水平的提高而增加。在CCE中,教育水平之间也出现了类似趋势,但收入水平之间没有。

结论

没有结果表明社会经济地位较低的亚组不适程度更高。无论采用何种检查方式,肠道准备都是所经历不适的主要原因。预期不适与实际经历不适之间的差异在社会经济地位较低的亚组中似乎并不更大,这表明这不是导致筛查接受率不平等的主要障碍。这是第一项同时调查CCE和结肠镜检查中个体不适差异,并能够按社会经济地位分层的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8bb/11295845/c73db0033364/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验