Suppr超能文献

采用血浆置换成功治疗中毒性表皮坏死松解症:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Successful treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis using plasmapheresis: A prospective observational study.

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Department of Emergency Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2017 Dec;42:65-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

Abstract

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a rare, severe, life-threatening skin disease and it requires urgent critical care, including admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). It is characterized by fatal sequelae and high mortality. Currently, insufficient evidence exists to support the use of any systemic adjuvant therapy, such as cyclophosphamide, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), or corticosteroids. However, plasmapheresis has been increasingly valued by clinicians due to its significant efficacy and little adverse side effects. To assess the efficacy of such treatment, 28 patients who were diagnosed with TEN or SJS/TEN overlap were continuously recruited in the ICU from February 2009 to August 2016. These patients including both children and adults were randomly divided into two groups based on whether or not plasmapheresis therapy was performed after admission, which resulted in a plasmapheresis group (n=13) and a non-plasmapheresis group (n=15). Severity of the disease and the efficacy of treatments were evaluated by the severity-of-illness score for TEN. The results indicated that plasmapheresis may be superior to conventional therapies, such as IVIg or corticosteroids. Furthermore, plasmapheresis combined with other treatments might not be advantageous compared to the effect of plasmapheresis alone.

摘要

中毒性表皮坏死松解症(TEN)是一种罕见的、严重的、危及生命的皮肤病,需要紧急重症监护,包括入住重症监护病房(ICU)。它具有致命的后遗症和高死亡率。目前,尚无足够的证据支持使用任何全身性辅助治疗,如环磷酰胺、静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)或皮质类固醇。然而,由于其显著的疗效和很少的不良反应,血浆置换已越来越受到临床医生的重视。为了评估这种治疗的疗效,我们连续招募了 28 名在 2009 年 2 月至 2016 年 8 月期间在 ICU 被诊断为 TEN 或 SJS/TEN 重叠的患者。这些患者包括儿童和成人,根据入院后是否进行血浆置换治疗,随机分为血浆置换组(n=13)和非血浆置换组(n=15)。通过 TEN 严重程度评分评估疾病严重程度和治疗效果。结果表明,血浆置换可能优于 IVIg 或皮质类固醇等常规治疗。此外,与单独使用血浆置换相比,血浆置换联合其他治疗可能没有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验