Ono Ayako, Arizono Shigeki, Fujimoto Koji, Akasaka Thai, Yamashita Rikiya, Furuta Akihiro, Isoda Hiroyoshi, Togashi Kaori
Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Nov;43:42-47. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
To evaluate images of non-contrast-enhanced 3D MR portography within a breath-hold (BH) using compressed sensing (CS) compared to standard respiratory-triggered (RT) sequences.
Fifty-nine healthy volunteers underwent MR portography using two sequences of balanced steady-state free-precession (bSSFP) with time-spatial labeling inversion pulses (Time-SLIP): BH bSSFP-CS and RT bSSFP. Two radiologists independently scored the diagnostic acceptability to delineate the portal branches (MPV: main portal vein; RPV: right portal vein; LPV: left portal vein; RPPV: right posterior portal vein; and P4 and P8: portal branch of segment 4 and segment 8, respectively) and the overall image quality on a four-point scale. We assessed noninferiority of BH bSSFP-CS to RT bSSFP. For quantitative analysis, vessel-to-liver contrast (C) was calculated in MPV, RPV and LPV.
BH bSSFP sequence was successfully performed with a 30-second acquisition time. The diagnostic acceptability scores of BH bSSFP-CS compared with RT bSSFP were statistically noninferior: MPV (95% CI for score difference of Reader 1 and Reader 2, respectively: [-0.16, 0.06], [-0.05, 0.02]), RPV ([-0.00, 0.11], [-0.01, 0.08]), LPV ([-0.03, 0.10], [-0.10, 0.03]), RPPV ([-0.03, 0.10], [-0.05, 0.05]), P4 ([-0.13, 0.34], [-0.28, 0.21]) and P8 ([-0.21, 0.11], [-0.25, -0.02]). However, the overall image quality of BH bSSFP-CS did not show noninferiority ([-0.61, -0.24], [-0.54, -0.17]). C values were significantly lower in BH bSSFP-CS (P<0.001).
CS enabled non-contrast-enhanced 3D bSSFP MR portography to be performed within a BH while maintaining noninferior diagnostic acceptability compared to standard RT bSSFP MR portography.
与标准呼吸触发(RT)序列相比,评估使用压缩感知(CS)的屏气(BH)非增强三维磁共振门静脉造影图像。
59名健康志愿者接受了磁共振门静脉造影,使用了两种带有时间空间标记反转脉冲(Time-SLIP)的平衡稳态自由进动(bSSFP)序列:BH bSSFP-CS和RT bSSFP。两名放射科医生独立对门静脉分支(MPV:门静脉主干;RPV:右门静脉;LPV:左门静脉;RPPV:右后门静脉;以及P4和P8:分别为第4段和第8段的门静脉分支)的诊断可接受性和整体图像质量进行四分制评分。我们评估了BH bSSFP-CS相对于RT bSSFP的非劣效性。进行定量分析时,计算了MPV、RPV和LPV中的血管与肝脏对比度(C)。
BH bSSFP序列在30秒采集时间内成功完成。与RT bSSFP相比,BH bSSFP-CS的诊断可接受性评分在统计学上非劣效:MPV(读者1和读者2评分差异的95%置信区间分别为:[-0.16, 0.06],[-0.05, 0.02]),RPV([-0.00, 0.11],[-0.01, 0.08]),LPV([-0.03, 0.10],[-0.10, 0.03]),RPPV([-0.03, 0.10],[-0.05, 0.05]),P4([-0.13, 0.34],[-0.28, 0.21])和P8([-0.21, 0.11],[-0.25, -0.02])。然而,BH bSSFP-CS的整体图像质量未显示非劣效性([-0.61, -0.24],[-0.54, -0.17])。BH bSSFP-CS中的C值显著更低(P<0.001)。
与标准RT bSSFP磁共振门静脉造影相比,CS使非增强三维bSSFP磁共振门静脉造影能够在屏气状态下进行,同时保持非劣效的诊断可接受性。