Kirpotina Liliya N, Schepetkin Igor A, Khlebnikov Andrei I, Ruban Olga I, Ge Yunjun, Ye Richard D, Kominsky Douglas J, Quinn Mark T
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, United States.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, United States; RASA Center, Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk, Russia.
Biochem Pharmacol. 2017 Oct 15;142:120-132. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
Formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) are expressed on a variety of leukocytes and play important roles in inflammation. Thus, FPR antagonists may represent novel therapeutics for modulating innate immunity and treating inflammatory diseases. Previously, 1H-pyrrol-2(5H)-ones were reported to be potent and competitive FPR1 antagonists. In the present studies, 42 additional 1H-pyrrol-2(5H)-one analogs were evaluated for FPR1 antagonist activity. We identified a number of novel competitive FPR1 antagonists that inhibited N-formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLF)-induced intracellular Ca mobilization in FPR1-transfected HL60 cells and effectively competed with WKYMVm-FITC for binding to FPR1 in FPR1-transfected RBL cells. The most active pyrroles inhibited human neutrophil Ca flux, chemotaxis, and adhesion to human epithelial cells, with the most potent being compounds 14 (4-benzoyl-1-hexyl-3-hydroxy-5-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-2-one) and 17 (4-benzoyl-5-(2,5-dimethoxyphenyl)-3-hydroxy-1-(2-methoxyethyl)-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-2-one). In addition, these FPR1 antagonists inhibited fMLF-induced phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2) in FPR1-RBL cells, differentiated HL-60 cells, and human neutrophils. Most of the antagonists were specific for FPR1 and did not inhibit WKYMVM/WKYMVm-induced intracellular Ca mobilization in FPR2-HL60 cells, FPR3-HL60 cells, or interleukin 8-induced Ca flux in human neutrophils. Moreover, molecular modeling showed that the active pyrroles had a significantly higher degree of similarity with the FPR1 antagonist pharmacophore template as compared to inactive analogs. Thus, the 4-aroyl-3-hydroxy-5-phenyl-1H-pyrrol-2(5H)-one scaffold represents an important backbone for the development of novel FPR1 antagonists and could provide important clues for understanding the molecular structural requirements of FPR1 antagonists.
甲酰肽受体(FPRs)在多种白细胞上表达,在炎症中发挥重要作用。因此,FPR拮抗剂可能成为调节固有免疫和治疗炎症性疾病的新型疗法。此前,据报道1H-吡咯-2(5H)-酮是强效竞争性FPR1拮抗剂。在本研究中,对另外42种1H-吡咯-2(5H)-酮类似物进行了FPR1拮抗剂活性评估。我们鉴定出了多种新型竞争性FPR1拮抗剂,它们能抑制N-甲酰甲硫氨酰-亮氨酰-苯丙氨酸(fMLF)诱导的FPR1转染HL60细胞内的钙动员,并在FPR1转染的RBL细胞中有效竞争WKYMVm-FITC与FPR1的结合。活性最高的吡咯类化合物抑制人中性粒细胞的钙通量、趋化性以及与人上皮细胞的黏附,其中最有效的是化合物14(4-苯甲酰基-1-己基-3-羟基-5-(4-羟基-3-甲氧基苯基)-2,5-二氢-1H-吡咯-2-酮)和17(4-苯甲酰基-5-(2,5-二甲氧基苯基)-3-羟基-1-(2-甲氧基乙基)-2,5-二氢-1H-吡咯-2-酮)。此外,这些FPR1拮抗剂抑制FPR1-RBL细胞、分化的HL-60细胞和人中性粒细胞中fMLF诱导的细胞外信号调节激酶(ERK1/2)的磷酸化。大多数拮抗剂对FPR1具有特异性,不抑制FPR2-HL60细胞、FPR3-HL60细胞中WKYMVM/WKYMVm诱导的细胞内钙动员,也不抑制人中性粒细胞中白细胞介素8诱导的钙通量。此外,分子模拟显示,与无活性类似物相比,活性吡咯类化合物与FPR1拮抗剂药效团模板的相似度显著更高。因此,4-芳酰基-3-羟基-5-苯基-1H-吡咯-2(5H)-酮骨架是开发新型FPR1拮抗剂的重要基础,可为理解FPR1拮抗剂的分子结构要求提供重要线索。