Groupe de recherche PRIMUS, Department of Family Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, 3001 12e Ave N, Sherbrooke, QC J1H 5N4, Canada.
Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018 Sep;1864(9 Pt A):2680-2689. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.05.028. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
Use of model organisms in aging research is problematic because our ability to extrapolate across the tree of life is not clear. On one hand, there are conserved pathways that regulate lifespan in organisms including yeast, nematodes, fruit flies, and mice. On the other, many intermediate taxa across the tree of life appear not to age at all, and there is substantial variation in aging mechanisms and patterns, sometimes even between closely related species. There are good evolutionary and mechanistic reasons to expect this complexity, but it means that model organisms must be used with caution and that results must always be interpreted through a broader comparative framework. Additionally, it is essential to include research on non-traditional and unusual species, and to integrate mechanistic and demographic research. There will be no simple answers regarding the biology of aging, and research approaches should reflect this. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Animal models of aging - edited by Houtkooper Riekelt.
在衰老研究中使用模式生物是有问题的,因为我们将其跨生命之树外推的能力尚不清楚。一方面,有一些保守的途径可以调节包括酵母、线虫、果蝇和老鼠在内的生物体的寿命。另一方面,生命之树中许多中间分类群似乎根本不会衰老,衰老机制和模式存在很大差异,有时甚至在密切相关的物种之间也是如此。从进化和机制的角度来看,这种复杂性是可以预料的,但这意味着必须谨慎使用模式生物,并且必须通过更广泛的比较框架来解释结果。此外,必须包括对非传统和不寻常物种的研究,并整合机制和人口研究。关于衰老生物学,不会有简单的答案,研究方法应该反映这一点。本文是题为“衰老的动物模型”的特刊的一部分——由 Houtkooper Riekelt 编辑。