Winsler Kurt, Holcomb Phillip J, Midgley Katherine J, Grainger Jonathan
NeuroCognition Laboratory, Department of Psychology, San Diego State UniversitySan Diego, CA, United States.
Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, CNRS and Aix-Marseille UniversitéMarseille, France.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jun 22;11:324. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00324. eCollection 2017.
Previous studies have shown that different spatial frequency information processing streams interact during the recognition of visual stimuli. However, it is a matter of debate as to the contributions of high and low spatial frequency (HSF and LSF) information for visual word recognition. This study examined the role of different spatial frequencies in visual word recognition using event-related potential (ERP) masked priming. EEG was recorded from 32 scalp sites in 30 English-speaking adults in a go/no-go semantic categorization task. Stimuli were white characters on a neutral gray background. Targets were uppercase five letter words preceded by a forward-mask (#######) and a 50 ms lowercase prime. Primes were either the same word (repeated) or a different word (un-repeated) than the subsequent target and either contained only high, only low, or full spatial frequency information. Additionally within each condition, half of the prime-target pairs were high lexical frequency, and half were low. In the full spatial frequency condition, typical ERP masked priming effects were found with an attenuated N250 (sub-lexical) and N400 (lexical-semantic) for repeated compared to un-repeated primes. For HSF primes there was a weaker N250 effect which interacted with lexical frequency, a significant reversal of the effect around 300 ms, and an N400-like effect for only high lexical frequency word pairs. LSF primes did not produce any of the classic ERP repetition priming effects, however they did elicit a distinct early effect around 200 ms in the opposite direction of typical repetition effects. HSF information accounted for many of the masked repetition priming ERP effects and therefore suggests that HSFs are more crucial for word recognition. However, LSFs did produce their own pattern of priming effects indicating that larger scale information may still play a role in word recognition.
先前的研究表明,不同的空间频率信息处理流在视觉刺激识别过程中相互作用。然而,关于高空间频率(HSF)和低空间频率(LSF)信息对视觉单词识别的贡献仍存在争议。本研究使用事件相关电位(ERP)掩蔽启动范式,考察了不同空间频率在视觉单词识别中的作用。在一项go/no-go语义分类任务中,记录了30名说英语的成年人32个头皮部位的脑电图。刺激物是中性灰色背景上的白色字符。目标是由前向掩蔽(#######)和50毫秒的小写启动词前置的大写五个字母的单词。启动词与后续目标词相同(重复)或不同(不重复),并且要么仅包含高空间频率信息、仅包含低空间频率信息,要么包含完整的空间频率信息。此外,在每种条件下,一半的启动词-目标词对是高词汇频率的,另一半是低词汇频率的。在完整空间频率条件下,与不重复的启动词相比,重复启动词时发现了典型的ERP掩蔽启动效应,即N250(亚词汇)和N400(词汇-语义)减弱。对于HSF启动词,N250效应较弱,且与词汇频率相互作用,在300毫秒左右效应发生显著反转,并且仅对高词汇频率的单词对有类似N400的效应。LSF启动词没有产生任何经典的ERP重复启动效应,然而它们确实在200毫秒左右引发了一种与典型重复效应相反方向的独特早期效应。HSF信息解释了许多掩蔽重复启动ERP效应,因此表明HSF对单词识别更为关键。然而,LSF确实产生了它们自己的启动效应模式,表明更大尺度的信息可能仍然在单词识别中起作用。