1 Department of Human Medicine, Private University of Witten/Herdecke GmbH, Germany.
2 Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation Centre GmbH, Cologne, Germany.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017 Sep;24(14):1544-1554. doi: 10.1177/2047487317718081. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
Trial design Prospective randomized multicentre interventional study. Methods Individual cardiovascular risk assessment in Ford Company, Germany employees ( n = 4.196), using the European Society of Cardiology-Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (ESC-SCORE) for classification into three risk groups. Subjects assigned to ESC high-risk group (ESC-SCORE ≥ 5%), without a history of cardiovascular disease were eligible for randomization to a multimodal 15-week intervention programme (INT) or to usual care and followed up for 36 months. Objectives Evaluation of the long-term effects of a risk-adjusted multimodal intervention in high-risk subjects. Primary endpoint: reduction of ESC-SCORE in INT versus usual care. Secondary endpoints: composite of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events and time to first cardiovascular event.
intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis. Results Four hundred and forty-seven subjects were randomized to INT ( n = 224) or to usual care ( n = 223). After 36 months ESC-SCORE development favouring INT was observed (INT: 8.70% to 10.03% vs. usual care: 8.49% to 12.09%; p = 0.005; net difference: 18.50%). Moreover, a significant reduction in the composite cardiovascular events was observed: (INT: n = 11 vs. usual care: n = 27). Hazard ratio of intervention versus control was 0.51 (95% confidence interval 0.25-1.03; p = 0.062) in the intention-to-treat analysis and 0.41 (95% confidence interval 0.18-0.90; p = 0.026) in the per-protocol analysis, respectively. No intervention-related adverse events or side-effects were observed. Conclusions Our results demonstrate the efficiency of identifying cardiovascular high-risk subjects by the ESC-SCORE in order to enrol them to a risk adjusted primary prevention programme. This strategy resulted in a significant improvement of ESC-SCORE, as well as a reduction in predefined cardiovascular endpoints in the INT within 36 months. (ISRCTN 23536103.).
目的:采用欧洲心脏病学会-系统性冠状动脉风险评估(ESC-SCORE)对德国福特公司员工(n=4196)进行个体心血管风险评估,将其分为三个风险组。无心血管病史且被归类为 ESC 高危组(ESC-SCORE≥5%)的患者,可被随机分配至为期 15 周的多模式干预方案(INT)或常规护理组,并随访 36 个月。
方法:前瞻性随机多中心干预性研究。
结果:447 例患者被随机分配至 INT(n=224)或常规护理组(n=223)。随访 36 个月后,INT 组 ESC-SCORE 较常规护理组明显降低(INT:8.70%10.03% vs. 常规护理:8.49%12.09%;p=0.005;差值:18.50%)。此外,INT 组复合心血管事件显著减少(INT:n=11 vs. 常规护理:n=27)。意向性治疗分析中,干预组与对照组的危险比为 0.51(95%置信区间 0.251.03;p=0.062),在符合方案集分析中,该比值为 0.41(95%置信区间 0.180.90;p=0.026)。
结论:本研究通过 ESC-SCORE 对心血管高危患者进行识别并纳入风险调整后的一级预防方案,结果显示 ESC-SCORE 显著降低,且 INT 组 36 个月内预先设定的心血管终点显著减少。(ISRCTN23536103.)。