Kozak Sarah M, Margison Kyle M, D'amico Dennis J
1 Department of Animal Science, 302B Agricultural Biotechnology Laboratory, 1390 Storrs Road, U-4163, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269; and.
2 School of Pharmacy, 69 North Eagleville Road, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA.
J Food Prot. 2017 Aug;80(8):1266-1272. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-17-035.
The use of antimicrobial compounds can be an effective approach to control Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods, but it can also be limited by cost, restrictions on concentrations in foods, and potential changes to organoleptic properties. Combinatorial approaches that produce additive or synergistic effects allow for reductions in individual antimicrobial concentrations while achieving the same level of control. The present study determined the MIC and MBC of an antimicrobial compound when used alone or in binary combinations against L. monocytogenes in growth media adjusted to pH values 7.4 and 5.5 and characterized interactions as synergistic, additive, or antagonistic. Inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations were defined as changes in L. monocytogenes counts of ≤1.0 or ≥3.0 log CFU/mL compared with the starting inoculum, respectively. Individually, lauric arginate (LAE), hydrogen peroxide (HP), and ε-polylysine (EPL) inhibited L. monocytogenes growth at the lowest concentrations when applied alone in broth adjusted to pH 7.4. Similarly, LAE, EPL, and HP had the lowest MBCs in broth adjusted to both pH levels. The inhibitory efficacy of both caprylic acid and sodium caprylate (SC) increased at the lower pH, with reductions in MICs of >98%. In total, 35 and 19 additive or synergistic inhibitory and bactericidal combinations were identified at pH values 7.4 and 5.5, respectively. Combinations of acidified calcium sulfate with lactic acid (ACSL) and SC were among the most synergistic inhibitory groupings at both pH levels, whereas EPL+LAE were the most effective bactericides at pH 7.4. Combinations of SC with EPL or ACSL were also among the most effective bactericides at pH 5.5. These data serve as a foundation for developing more effective antimicrobial approaches for the control of L. monocytogenes in foods with different pH levels.
使用抗菌化合物可能是控制即食食品中单核细胞增生李斯特菌的有效方法,但它也可能受到成本、食品中浓度限制以及感官特性潜在变化的限制。产生相加或协同效应的组合方法能够在实现相同控制水平的同时降低单个抗菌剂的浓度。本研究确定了一种抗菌化合物单独使用或与其他物质二元组合使用时,在pH值分别为7.4和5.5的生长培养基中对单核细胞增生李斯特菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和最低杀菌浓度(MBC),并将相互作用表征为协同、相加或拮抗。抑菌浓度和杀菌浓度分别定义为与初始接种物相比,单核细胞增生李斯特菌数量变化≤1.0 log CFU/mL或≥3.0 log CFU/mL。单独使用时,在pH值为7.4的肉汤中,月桂酰精氨酸乙酯(LAE)、过氧化氢(HP)和ε-聚赖氨酸(EPL)在最低浓度下就能抑制单核细胞增生李斯特菌的生长。同样,在两种pH值水平的肉汤中,LAE、EPL和HP的MBC最低。辛酸和辛酸钠(SC)在较低pH值下的抑菌效果增强,MIC降低>98%。总共在pH值7.4和5.5时分别鉴定出35种和19种相加或协同的抑菌和杀菌组合。在两个pH值水平上,酸化硫酸钙与乳酸(ACSL)和SC的组合是最具协同作用的抑菌组合之一,而EPL + LAE在pH值7.4时是最有效的杀菌剂。SC与EPL或ACSL的组合在pH值5.5时也是最有效的杀菌剂之一。这些数据为开发更有效的抗菌方法以控制不同pH值食品中的单核细胞增生李斯特菌奠定了基础。