Hirai Fumihiko, Edagawa Makoto, Shimamatsu Shinichiro, Toyozawa Ryo, Toyokawa Gouji, Nosaki Kaname, Yamaguchi Masafumi, Seto Takashi, Takenoyama Mitsuhiro, Ichinose Yukito
Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan.
Oncol Lett. 2017 Jul;14(1):306-312. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6118. Epub 2017 May 4.
Erlotinib is one of the treatment choices for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of the epidermal growth factor receptor () mutation status. However, its efficacy for the treatment of patients with NSCLC with wild type or who are beyond the usage of gefitinib remains controversial. The present study therefore retrospectively assessed the efficacy of erlotinib in patients with wild type who had previously undergone gefitinib therapy. A total of 222 patients with NSCLC who received chemotherapeutic treatment with erlotinib between July 2007 and February 2013 were evaluated. The background variables, response rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were retrospectively analyzed. The male/female ratio of patients was 103/119, and patients had a median age of 63 years (range, 33-95 years). A total of 10 of the 222 patients had clinical stages IIIB/IV, 191 had adenocarcinoma, 5 had large cell carcinoma, 10 had squamous cell carcinoma and 6 had NSCLC of a variety not otherwise specified. The mutation was positive, wild type or unknown in 95, 52 and 75 patients, respectively. In the 52 patients with wild type, there were 3 partial responders, 25 with stable disease and 24 with progressive disease, for a response rate of 6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-15%]. The median PFS of wild type and positive were 1.1 months (95% CI, 1.04-1.16 months) and 5.42 months (95% CI, 5.43-5.68 months), respectively. The results of the study demonstrated that erlotinib is not sufficiently effective for patients with NSCLC who possess the wild type status.
厄洛替尼是晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的治疗选择之一,无论其表皮生长因子受体()突变状态如何。然而,其对野生型或已超出吉非替尼使用范围的NSCLC患者的治疗效果仍存在争议。因此,本研究回顾性评估了厄洛替尼对先前接受过吉非替尼治疗的野生型患者的疗效。对2007年7月至2013年2月期间接受厄洛替尼化疗的222例NSCLC患者进行了评估。回顾性分析了背景变量、缓解率、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存率。患者的男女比例为103/119,中位年龄为63岁(范围33 - 95岁)。222例患者中,共有10例为临床ⅢB/Ⅳ期,191例为腺癌,5例为大细胞癌,10例为鳞状细胞癌,6例为其他未明确分类的NSCLC。95例、52例和75例患者的突变分别为阳性、野生型或未知。在52例野生型患者中,有3例部分缓解,25例病情稳定,24例病情进展,缓解率为6%[95%置信区间(CI),1.3 - 15%]。野生型和阳性患者的中位PFS分别为1.1个月(95%CI,1.04 - 1.16个月)和5.42个月(95%CI,5.43 - 5.68个月)。研究结果表明,厄洛替尼对具有野生型状态的NSCLC患者疗效不足。