Koenig Lane, Soltoff Samuel A, Demiralp Berna, Demehin Akinluwa A, Foster Nancy E, Steinberg Caroline Rossi, Vaz Christopher, Wetzel Scott, Xu Susan
1 KNG Health Consulting, LLC, Rockville, MD.
2 American Hospital Association, Washington, DC.
Am J Med Qual. 2017 Nov/Dec;32(6):611-616. doi: 10.1177/1062860616681840. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
In 2016, Medicare's Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HAC-RP) will reduce hospital payments by $364 million. Although observers have questioned the validity of certain HAC-RP measures, less attention has been paid to the determination of low-performing hospitals (bottom quartile) and the assignment of penalties. This study investigated possible bias in the HAC-RP by simulating hospitals' likelihood of being in the worst-performing quartile for 8 patient safety measures, assuming identical expected complication rates across hospitals. Simulated likelihood of being a poor performer varied with hospital size. This relationship depended on the measure's complication rate. For 3 of 8 measures examined, the equal-quality simulation identified poor performers similarly to empirical data (c-statistic approximately 0.7 or higher) and explained most of the variation in empirical performance by size (Efron's R > 0.85). The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services could address potential bias in the HAC-RP by stratifying by hospital size or using a broader "all-harm" measure.
2016年,医疗保险的医院获得性疾病减少计划(HAC-RP)将使医院支付减少3.64亿美元。尽管观察人士对某些HAC-RP措施的有效性提出了质疑,但对表现不佳医院(底部四分位数)的判定和处罚分配却较少受到关注。本研究通过模拟医院在8项患者安全措施方面处于表现最差四分位数的可能性,调查了HAC-RP中可能存在的偏差,假设各医院的预期并发症发生率相同。模拟的表现不佳可能性随医院规模而异。这种关系取决于该措施的并发症发生率。在所检查的8项措施中的3项中,同等质量模拟识别出的表现不佳者与实证数据类似(c统计量约为0.7或更高),并解释了按规模划分的实证表现中的大部分差异(埃弗龙R>0.85)。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心可以通过按医院规模分层或使用更广泛的“全伤害”措施来解决HAC-RP中潜在的偏差。