• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CALM干预措施:行为健康危机评估、联系与管理改善患者护理。

CALM Interventions: Behavioral Health Crisis Assessment, Linkage, and Management Improve Patient Care.

作者信息

Lester Natalie A, Thompson Laura R, Herget Kendal, Stephens Julie A, Campo John V, Adkins Eric J, Terndrup Thomas E, Moffatt-Bruce Susan

机构信息

1 The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH.

出版信息

Am J Med Qual. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):65-71. doi: 10.1177/1062860617696154. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1177/1062860617696154
PMID:28693348
Abstract

Emergency departments (EDs) have seen rising numbers of patients in psychiatric crises, patient boarding, and throughput delays. This study describes and evaluates the impact of a Crisis Assessment Linkage and Management (CALM) service designed to manage behavioral health crises. A year-to-year comparison was performed before (n = 2211 ED visits) and after implementation of CALM (n = 2387). CALM was associated with reductions in median ED and hospital length of stay (LOS) from 9.5 to 7.3 hours and 46.2 to 31.4 hours, respectively. Mean transformed ED LOS decreased by 32.4% ( P < .001). The CALM model improved patient care and throughput metrics by proactively managing behavioral health crises.

摘要

急诊科接待的处于精神危机、患者滞留及流转延迟状态的患者数量不断增加。本研究描述并评估了一项旨在管理行为健康危机的危机评估联动与管理(CALM)服务的影响。在CALM实施之前(n = 2211次急诊科就诊)和实施之后(n = 2387次)进行了逐年比较。CALM与急诊科和医院中位住院时长(LOS)的缩短相关,分别从9.5小时降至7.3小时,从46.2小时降至31.4小时。急诊科平均转化住院时长减少了32.4%(P < .001)。CALM模型通过主动管理行为健康危机改善了患者护理及流转指标。

相似文献

1
CALM Interventions: Behavioral Health Crisis Assessment, Linkage, and Management Improve Patient Care.CALM干预措施:行为健康危机评估、联系与管理改善患者护理。
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):65-71. doi: 10.1177/1062860617696154. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
2
Opening of Psychiatric Observation Unit Eases Boarding Crisis.精神科观察单元的开设缓解了住院危机。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;25(4):456-460. doi: 10.1111/acem.13369. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
3
Analysis of Emergency Department Length of Stay for Mental Health Patients at Ten Massachusetts Emergency Departments.分析马萨诸塞州十家急诊部精神健康患者的急诊部停留时间。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;70(2):193-202.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.10.005. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
4
Factors Associated With the Likelihood of Hospitalization Following Emergency Department Visits for Behavioral Health Conditions.因行为健康状况前往急诊科就诊后住院可能性的相关因素。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;23(11):1257-1266. doi: 10.1111/acem.13044. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
5
A systematic review of crisis interventions used in the emergency department: recommendations for pediatric care and research.急诊科使用的危机干预措施的系统评价:儿科护理与研究建议
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2010 Dec;26(12):952-62. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181fe9211.
6
Decreasing Emergency Department Walkout Rate and Boarding Hours by Improving Inpatient Length of Stay.通过缩短住院时间来降低急诊科患者自行离开率和住院等待时间
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;18(6):982-992. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.7.34663. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
7
Predictors of psychiatric boarding in the emergency department.急诊科精神科住院的预测因素。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;16(1):71-5. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.10.23011. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
8
Use of a Dedicated, Non-Physician-led Mental Health Team to Reduce Pediatric Emergency Department Lengths of Stay.使用专门的、由非医生主导的心理健康团队来缩短儿科急诊科的住院时间。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Apr;23(4):440-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12908. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
9
Ridesharing as an Alternative to Ambulance Transport for Voluntary Psychiatric Patients in the Emergency Department.拼车作为急诊科自愿精神科患者替代救护车转运的一种选择。
West J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr 21;21(3):618-621. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.2.45526.
10
The association between length of emergency department boarding and mortality.急诊科滞留时间与死亡率之间的关联。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Dec;18(12):1324-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01236.x.

引用本文的文献

1
An Evaluation Protocol for A Stabilisation and Referral Area (SARA): A Novel Short Stay Psychiatry Unit Serving A Remote Region of Australia.一个稳定与转诊区(SARA)的评估方案:一个服务于澳大利亚偏远地区的新型短期住院精神科病房。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 1;26(2):39448. doi: 10.31083/AP39448. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Enhancing Emergency Room Mental Health Crisis Response: A Systematic Review of Integrated Models.加强急诊室心理健康危机应对:综合模型的系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Nov 19;16(11):e74042. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74042. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Specialized short term crisis intervention for patients with personality disorder: Effects on coercion and length of stay.
专门针对人格障碍患者的短期危机干预:对强制治疗和住院时间的影响。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2024 Dec;70(8):1516-1524. doi: 10.1177/00207640241277161. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
4
The effect of psychiatric decision unit services on inpatient admissions and mental health presentations in emergency departments: an interrupted time series analysis from two cities and one rural area in England.精神科决策单元服务对急诊科住院和精神卫生就诊的影响:来自英格兰两个城市和一个农村地区的中断时间序列分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2024 Mar 21;33:e15. doi: 10.1017/S2045796024000209.
5
Interventions to Reduce Repeat Presentations to Hospital Emergency Departments for Mental Health Concerns: A Scoping Review of the Literature.减少因心理健康问题再次前往医院急诊科就诊的干预措施:文献综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 18;11(8):1161. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081161.
6
Service use preceding and following first referral for psychiatric emergency care at a short-stay crisis unit: A cohort study across three cities and one rural area in England.服务利用在短期留观危机单元的精神科急诊首次转介之前和之后:一项跨越英格兰三个城市和一个农村地区的队列研究。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;69(4):928-941. doi: 10.1177/00207640221142530. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
7
Short-stay crisis units for mental health patients on crisis care pathways: systematic review and meta-analysis.处于危机护理路径上的心理健康患者的短期危机单元:系统评价与荟萃分析。
BJPsych Open. 2022 Jul 25;8(4):e144. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.534.
8
The Role of Entrapment in Crisis-Focused Psychotherapy Delivered in Psychiatric Emergency Settings: A Comparative Study.在精神科急诊环境中实施的聚焦危机心理治疗中,诱捕的作用:一项比较研究。
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 15;10:2600. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02600. eCollection 2019.