Misterski Marcin, Puślecki Mateusz, Grygier Marek, Olasińska-Wiśniewska Anna, Lesiak Maciej, Araszkiewicz Aleksander, Perek Barłomiej, Choręziak Aneta, Lindner Jacek, Komosa Anna, Buczkowski Piotr, Ligowski Marcin, Katarzyński Sławomir, Jemielity Marek
Department of Cardiosurgery and Transplantology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017 Jun;12(2):172-177. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.67481. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
Transapical aortic valve implantation (TA-AVI) has been widely introduced for treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis in the last decade. Here we report our first clinical experience with 10 patients using the second-generation transapical Symetis Acurate TA aortic valve designed for transapical implantation.
To evaluate the results of transapical access in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) among patients with unsuitable vascular access.
All patients had been assessed by a local heart team and were disqualified from surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) and the transfemoral TAVI approach. Mean age was 75.4 ±3.9 years (range: 68-80), with 20% being female. Logistic EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) and STS (Society of Thoracic Surgeons) were 15.4 ±8.9% and 20.5 ±4.5%, respectively.
All implantations were performed successfully in the intra-annular and subcoronary position. There were no conversions to surgical AVR. All patients survived 30-day follow-up. No strokes or transient ischemic attacks were reported. There was no need for pacemaker implantation and none of the patients demonstrated moderate or significant paravalvular leakage. The mean aortic gradients improved significantly from a baseline of 57.0 ±19.2 mm Hg to a 30-day value of 14.2 ±4.1 mm Hg.
Our initial clinical results indicate satisfactory functionality in patients after trans-apical implantation of the Symetis Acurate aortic valve. The procedure of implantation seems to be straightforward and may be considered in patients in whom a transfemoral approach is not a good option.
在过去十年中,经心尖主动脉瓣植入术(TA-AVI)已被广泛应用于治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者。在此,我们报告我们使用专为经心尖植入设计的第二代经心尖Symetis Acurate TA主动脉瓣对10例患者的首次临床经验。
评估经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)中经心尖入路在血管入路不合适患者中的效果。
所有患者均由当地心脏团队进行评估,不符合外科主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)及经股动脉TAVI入路标准。平均年龄为75.4±3.9岁(范围:68 - 80岁),女性占20%。逻辑欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)和胸外科医师协会(STS)评分分别为15.4±8.9%和20.5±4.5%。
所有植入均在瓣环内及冠状动脉下位置成功完成。无一例转为外科AVR。所有患者均存活至30天随访。未报告中风或短暂性脑缺血发作。无需植入起搏器,且无一例患者出现中度或重度瓣周漏。平均主动脉瓣压差从基线的57.0±19.2 mmHg显著改善至30天时的14.2±4.1 mmHg。
我们的初步临床结果表明,Symetis Acurate主动脉瓣经心尖植入术后患者功能良好。植入过程似乎简单直接,对于经股动脉入路不是理想选择的患者可考虑采用。