Chen Gailing, Bliden Kevin P, Chaudhary Rahul, Liu Fang, Kaza Himabindu, Navarese Eliano P, Tantry Udaya S, Gurbel Paul A
Sinai Center for Thrombosis Research, Sinai Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017 Aug;44(2):223-233. doi: 10.1007/s11239-017-1524-y.
High central aortic pulse pressure (CPP) and thrombin-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength (TIP-FCS) have been associated with ischemic outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease in separate studies. But, the ischemic risk associated with these factors has never been analyzed in a single study and their interrelation is unknown. The primary aim of the study was to establish cut points for CPP and TIP-FCS measured at the time of catheterization associated with long term major adverse cardiovascular events. We enrolled 334 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and assessed thrombogenicity by thrombelastography. Patients were followed up to 3 years. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke and the secondary endpoint was occurrence of the primary endpoint or recurrent ischemic events requiring hospitalization. Patients with primary and secondary endpoint occurrence had higher CPP (83 ± 20 vs. 60 ± 18 mmHg, p < 0.0001; 70 ± 21 vs. 59 ± 18 mmHg, p < 0.0001, respectively) and TIP-FCS (68.5 ± 5.8 vs. 65.5 ± 5.0 mm, p = 0.008; 67.4 ± 5.9 vs. 65.2 ± 4.8 mm, p = 0.001, respectively). CPP >60 mmHg and TIP-FCS >69 mm were both independent predictors of primary endpoint occurrence (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.02, respectively). ROC analysis for CPP and TIP-FCS showed a C-statistic of 0.81 (p < 0.0001) and 0.68 (p = 0.007) for the primary endpoint, respectively. Patients with CPP >60 mmHg had higher TIP-FCS (66.8 ± 5.1 vs. 64.8 ± 5.0 mm, p < 0.001) and primary and secondary endpoint occurrence (13 vs. 1.1%, p < 0.0001 and 31.8 vs. 14.4%, p = 0.0002, respectively). CPP >60 mmHg + TIP-FCS > 69 mm was associated with a markedly increased risk of primary endpoint occurrence [HR (95% CI) 5.4(2.3-12.5), p = 0.0001]. High CPP and thrombogenicity are interrelated; each are independently associated with increased cardiovascular risk; and simultaneous presence markedly enhances risk. The mechanistic link between CPP and thrombogenicity deserves further study.
在单独的研究中,高中心主动脉脉压(CPP)和凝血酶诱导的血小板 - 纤维蛋白凝块强度(TIP - FCS)已被证明与冠心病患者的缺血性结局相关。但是,这些因素相关的缺血风险从未在单一研究中进行分析,它们之间的相互关系也尚不清楚。本研究的主要目的是确定在导管插入术时测量的与长期主要不良心血管事件相关的CPP和TIP - FCS的切点。我们连续纳入了334例接受心脏导管插入术的患者,并通过血栓弹力图评估血栓形成性。对患者进行了长达3年的随访。主要终点是心血管死亡、心肌梗死和缺血性中风的复合终点,次要终点是主要终点的发生或需要住院治疗的复发性缺血事件。发生主要和次要终点的患者具有更高的CPP(分别为83±20 vs. 60±18 mmHg,p <0.0001;70±21 vs. 59±18 mmHg,p <0.0001)和TIP - FCS(分别为68.5±5.8 vs. 65.5±5.0 mm,p = 0.008;67.4±5.9 vs. 65.2±4.8 mm,p = 0.001)。CPP>60 mmHg和TIP - FCS>69 mm均是主要终点发生的独立预测因素(分别为p = 0.0001和p = 0.02)。CPP和TIP - FCS的ROC分析显示,主要终点的C统计量分别为0.81(p <0.0001)和0.68(p = 0.007)。CPP>60 mmHg的患者具有更高的TIP - FCS(66.8±5.1 vs. 64.8±5.0 mm,p <0.001)以及主要和次要终点的发生率(分别为13% vs. 1.1%,p <0.0001;31.8% vs. 14.4%,p = 0.0002)。CPP>60 mmHg + TIP - FCS>69 mm与主要终点发生风险显著增加相关[HR(95%CI)5.4(2.3 - 12.5),p = 0.0001]。高CPP与血栓形成性相互关联;两者均独立与心血管风险增加相关;同时存在则显著增加风险。CPP与血栓形成性之间的机制联系值得进一步研究。