Department of Zoology, Goa University, Taleigao Plateau, Goa 403206, India.
J Appl Toxicol. 2018 Jan;38(1):81-99. doi: 10.1002/jat.3496. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
Many of the known human carcinogens are potent genotoxins that are efficiently detected as carcinogens in human populations but certain types of compounds such as immunosuppressants, sex hormones, etc. act via non-genotoxic mechanism. The absence of genotoxicity and the diversity of modes of action of non-genotoxic carcinogens make predicting their carcinogenic potential extremely challenging. There is evidence that combinations of different short-term tests provide a better and efficient prediction of human genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens. The purpose of this study is to summarize the in vivo and in vitro comet assay (CMT) results of group 1 carcinogens selected from the International Agency for Research on Cancer and to discuss the utility of the comet assay along with other genotoxic assays such as Ames, in vivo micronucleus (MN), and in vivo chromosomal aberration (CA) test. Of the 62 agents for which valid genotoxic data were available, 38 of 61 (62.3%) were Ames test positive, 42 of 60 (70%) were in vivo MN test positive and 36 of 45 (80%) were positive for the in vivo CA test. Higher sensitivity was seen in in vivo CMT (90%) and in vitro CMT (86.9%) assay. Combination of two tests has greater sensitivity than individual tests: in vivo MN + in vivo CA (88.6%); in vivo MN + in vivo CMT (92.5%); and in vivo MN + in vitro CMT (95.6%). Combinations of in vivo or in vitro CMT with other tests provided better sensitivity. In vivo CMT in combination with in vivo CA provided the highest sensitivity (96.7%).
许多已知的人类致癌物是有效的遗传毒素,在人类群体中作为致癌物被有效检测到,但某些类型的化合物,如免疫抑制剂、性激素等,通过非遗传毒性机制发挥作用。非遗传毒性致癌物没有遗传毒性和作用方式的多样性,使得预测其致癌潜力极具挑战性。有证据表明,不同短期测试的组合为预测人类遗传毒性和非遗传毒性致癌物提供了更好和更有效的方法。本研究的目的是总结从国际癌症研究机构选择的第 1 组致癌物的体内和体外彗星试验(CMT)结果,并讨论彗星试验与其他遗传毒性试验(如 Ames 试验、体内微核(MN)试验和体内染色体畸变(CA)试验)的实用性。在有有效遗传毒性数据的 62 种试剂中,61 种(62.3%)Ames 试验阳性,60 种(70%)体内 MN 试验阳性,45 种(80%)体内 CA 试验阳性。体内 CMT(90%)和体外 CMT(86.9%)检测的灵敏度更高。两种检测方法的组合比单独使用一种检测方法具有更高的灵敏度:体内 MN + 体内 CA(88.6%);体内 MN + 体内 CMT(92.5%);以及体内 MN + 体外 CMT(95.6%)。体内或体外 CMT 与其他检测方法的组合提供了更好的灵敏度。体内 CMT 与体内 CA 的结合提供了最高的灵敏度(96.7%)。