1 Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS MultiMedica Hospital, Castellanza, Italy.
2 Department of Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Int J Stroke. 2017 Jul;12(5):560-567. doi: 10.1177/1747493017694395. Epub 2017 Jan 1.
Although proof-based medicine has generated much valid evidence for the drawing up of guidelines and recommendations for best clinical practice in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis, whether and when it is better to employ endarterectomy or stenting as the intervention of choice still remain matters of debate. Moreover, guidelines have been targeted up to now to the 'representative' patient, as resulting from the statistical analyses of the studies conducted on the safety and efficacy of both interventions as well as on medical therapy alone. The Italian Stroke Organization (ISO) and Stroke Prevention and Awareness Diffusion (SPREAD) group has thus decided to update its statements for an 8th edition. To this end, a multidisciplinary team of authors representing Italian scientific societies in the neurology, neuroradiology, vascular and endovascular surgery, interventional cardiology, and general medicine fields re-examined the literature available on stroke. Analyses and considerations on patient subgroups have allowed to model the risks/benefits of endarterectomy and stenting in the individual. Accordingly, the guideline's original methodology has been revised to follow the new SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network) Grade-like approach, integrating it with new considerations on Precision, or Personalized Medicine. Therefore, this guideline offers recommendations on precision medicine for the single patient, and can be followed in addition to the more standard guidelines.
循证医学为制定有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄的最佳临床实践指南和建议提供了大量有效的证据,但究竟何时以及是否应选择颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术作为首选干预措施仍存在争议。此外,指南迄今为止一直针对“代表性”患者,这是对两项干预措施的安全性和有效性以及单独药物治疗的研究进行统计分析的结果。因此,意大利卒中组织(ISO)和卒中预防与意识传播(SPREAD)小组决定更新其第 8 版声明。为此,一个代表意大利神经病学、神经放射学、血管和血管内外科、介入心脏病学和普通医学领域的多学科作者团队重新审查了关于卒中的现有文献。对患者亚组的分析和考虑允许对颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术的个体风险/获益进行建模。因此,指南的原始方法学已被修订,以遵循新的 SIGN(苏格兰校际指南网络)分级类似方法,并结合对精准医学或个体化医学的新考虑进行整合。因此,本指南为个体患者提供了精准医学建议,并可在更标准的指南之外遵循。