Suppr超能文献

ICU 中亚综合征谵妄的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Outcomes of subsyndromal delirium in ICU: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Instituto D'Or de pesquisa e ensino, Rua Diniz Cordeiro, 30 Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22281-100, Brasil.

Hospital Copa D'Or, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2017 Jul 12;21(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1765-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Subsyndromal delirium (SSD) is a frequent condition and has been commonly described as an intermediate stage between delirium and normal cognition. However, the true frequency of SSD and its impact on clinically relevant outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains unclear.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PsychINFO, with no language restrictions, up to 1 October 2016 to identify publications that evaluated SSD in ICU patients.

RESULTS

The six eligible studies were evaluated. SSD was present in 950 (36%) patients. Four studies evaluated only surgical patients. Four studies used the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) and two used the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) score to diagnose SSD. The meta-analysis showed an increased hospital length of stay (LOS) in SSD patients (0.31, 0.12-0.51, p = 0.002; I  = 34%). Hospital mortality was described in two studies but it was not significant (hazard ratio 0.97, 0.61-1.55, p = 0.90 and 5% vs 9%, p = 0.05). The use of antipsychotics in SSD patients to prevent delirium was evaluated in two studies but it did not modify ICU LOS (6.5 (4-8) vs 7 (4-9) days, p = 0.66 and 2 (2-3) vs 3 (2-3) days, p = 0.517) or mortality (9 (26.5%) vs 7 (20.6%), p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

SSD occurs in one-third of the ICU patients and has limited impact on the outcomes. The current literature concerning SSD is composed of small-sample studies with methodological differences, impairing a clear conclusion about the association between SSD and progression to delirium or worse ICU clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

亚综合征性谵妄(SSD)是一种常见的病症,通常被描述为谵妄和正常认知之间的中间阶段。然而,SSD 的真实频率及其对重症监护病房(ICU)中临床相关结局的影响仍不清楚。

方法

我们在PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆和 PsychINFO 中进行了系统检索,没有语言限制,检索截至 2016 年 10 月 1 日,以确定评估 ICU 患者 SSD 的出版物。

结果

纳入了 6 项符合条件的研究。SSD 存在于 950 名(36%)患者中。4 项研究仅评估了手术患者。4 项研究使用了重症监护谵妄筛查检查表(ICDSC),2 项研究使用了意识模糊评估法(CAM)评分来诊断 SSD。meta 分析显示 SSD 患者的住院时间延长(0.31,0.12-0.51,p=0.002;I=34%)。有 2 项研究描述了医院死亡率,但无统计学意义(风险比 0.97,0.61-1.55,p=0.90 和 5% vs 9%,p=0.05)。有 2 项研究评估了 SSD 患者使用抗精神病药物预防谵妄,但并未改变 ICU 住院时间(6.5(4-8)vs 7(4-9)天,p=0.66 和 2(2-3)vs 3(2-3)天,p=0.517)或死亡率(9(26.5%)vs 7(20.6%),p=0.55)。

结论

SSD 发生在 ICU 患者的三分之一中,对结局的影响有限。目前关于 SSD 的文献由小样本研究组成,存在方法学差异,这使得我们无法就 SSD 与向谵妄或更差的 ICU 临床结局发展之间的关联得出明确结论。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c902/5506578/c6670d1f0515/13054_2017_1765_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验