• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉内膜切除术后围手术期对侧卒中的特征描述

Characterization of perioperative contralateral stroke after carotid endarterectomy.

作者信息

Clouse W Darrin, Ergul Emel A, Patel Virendra I, Lancaster R Todd, LaMuraglia Glenn M, Cambria Richard P, Conrad Mark F

机构信息

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1450-1456. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.059. Epub 2017 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.059
PMID:28697940
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Contralateral stroke is an infrequent cause of perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Whereas the risks of ipsilateral stroke complicating CEA have been discriminated, factors that lead to contralateral stroke are poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to identify the risk of perioperative (30-day) contralateral stroke after CEA as well as predisposing preoperative and operative factors. Its specific effect on long-term survival was interrogated.

METHODS

The Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE) was queried from April 1, 2003, to February 29, 2016, for all CEAs. Duplicated patients and those without complete data were excluded. Patients sustaining contralateral stroke after CEA in the 30-day postoperative period were identified. Demographic, preoperative, and operative factors were analyzed to identify discriminators between those with and those without contralateral stroke. Logistic regression modeling was performed to identify factors independently associated with contralateral stroke. The effect of contralateral stroke on 5-year survival was compared with patients with ipsilateral stroke and no stroke using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank testing compared survival curves.

RESULTS

There were 10,837 CEAs performed during the study. Average age was 70.4 ± 9.3 years; 6605 (61%) patients were male, and 40% (n = 4324) were performed for symptoms. Most were current or former smokers (n = 8619 [80%]). Coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure were identified in 31% and 8.6%, respectively. Overall, there were 190 strokes within 30 days of CEA (1.8%); 131 were ipsilateral (1.3%), and 59 (0.5%) patients were identified as having contralateral perioperative stroke. Thirteen patients sustained bilateral stroke (0.1%). Significant univariate associations included urgency (P = .0001), ipsilateral stenosis severity (P = .004), length of operation (P = .0001), CEA with coronary artery bypass graft (P = .0001), CEA with other arterial surgery (P = .01), and CEA with proximal endovascular procedure (P = .03). Contralateral occlusion (P = .06) and degree of contralateral carotid stenosis (P = .14) did not correlate. After logistic regression analysis of significant univariate anatomic and operative factors, length of procedure (odds ratio [OR], 1.08/15 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.15; P = .02), urgency of operation (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.3-4.6; P = .006), and concomitant proximal endovascular intervention (OR, 8.7; 95% CI, 4.5-31.2; P = .001) remained predictors of contralateral stroke after CEA. Occurrence of both ipsilateral (P < .001) and contralateral (P = .023) stroke significantly reduced 5-year survival compared with those without stroke. There was no difference in the negative survival effect based on laterality of stroke (P = .24).

CONCLUSIONS

Contralateral stroke after CEA is rare, affecting 0.5% of patients. Traditional risk reduction medical therapy does not affect occurrence. Degree of contralateral stenosis, including contralateral occlusion, does not predict perioperative contralateral stroke. Urgency of operation, length of operation, and performance of concomitant, ipsilateral endovascular intervention predict contralateral stroke risk with CEA. Contralateral stroke affects long-term survival similar to ipsilateral stroke after CEA.

摘要

目的

对侧卒中是颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)围手术期卒中的罕见原因。虽然CEA并发同侧卒中的风险已得到区分,但导致对侧卒中的因素尚不明确。本研究的目的是确定CEA术后围手术期(30天)对侧卒中的风险以及术前和手术的易感因素。并探讨其对长期生存的具体影响。

方法

查询2003年4月1日至2016年2月29日新英格兰血管研究组(VSGNE)的所有CEA病例。排除重复病例和数据不完整的病例。确定术后30天内发生CEA后对侧卒中的患者。分析人口统计学、术前和手术因素,以确定发生和未发生对侧卒中患者之间的鉴别因素。进行逻辑回归建模以确定与对侧卒中独立相关的因素。采用Kaplan-Meier方法比较对侧卒中对5年生存率的影响与同侧卒中和无卒中患者的影响。对数秩检验比较生存曲线。

结果

研究期间共进行了10837例CEA。平均年龄为70.4±9.3岁;6605例(61%)为男性,40%(n = 4324)因症状而行手术。大多数为现吸烟者或既往吸烟者(n = 8619 [80%])。分别有31%和8.6%的患者患有冠状动脉疾病和充血性心力衰竭。总体而言,CEA术后30天内发生190例卒中(1.8%)%);131例为同侧卒中(1.3%),59例(0.5%)患者被确定为围手术期对侧卒中。13例患者发生双侧卒中(0.1%)。显著的单因素关联包括急诊手术(P = .0001)、同侧狭窄严重程度(P = .004)、手术时间(P = .0001)、CEA联合冠状动脉搭桥术(P = .0001)、CEA联合其他动脉手术(P = .01)以及CEA联合近端血管内介入治疗(P = .03)。对侧闭塞(P = .06)和对侧颈动脉狭窄程度(P = .14)无相关性。对显著的单因素解剖和手术因素进行逻辑回归分析后,手术时间(比值比[OR],1.08/15分钟;95%置信区间[CI],1.01 - 1.15;P = .02)、手术急诊情况(OR,2.5;9%CI, 1.3 - 4.6;P = .006)以及同期近端血管内介入治疗(OR,8.7;95% CI,4.5 - 31.2;P = .001)仍然是CEA术后对侧卒中的预测因素。与无卒中患者相比,同侧卒中(P < .001)和对侧卒中(P = .023)的发生均显著降低了5年生存率。基于卒中侧别,生存的负面影响无差异(P = .24)。

结论

CEA术后对侧卒中很少见,影响患者率为0.5%。传统的降低风险药物治疗不影响其发生率。对侧狭窄程度,包括对侧闭塞,不能预测围手术期对侧卒中。手术急诊情况、手术时间以及同期同侧血管内介入治疗可预测CEA术后对侧卒中风险。CEA术后对侧卒中对长期生存的影响与同侧卒中相似。

相似文献

1
Characterization of perioperative contralateral stroke after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术后围手术期对侧卒中的特征描述
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1450-1456. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.059. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
2
Contralateral Occlusion and Concomitant Procedures Drive Risk of Non-ipsilateral Stroke After Carotid Endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后非对侧卒中的风险与对侧闭塞和同时进行的手术相关。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 May;57(5):619-625. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.11.009. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
3
Early carotid endarterectomy performed 2 to 5 days after the onset of neurologic symptoms leads to comparable results to carotid endarterectomy performed at later time points.在神经症状出现后2至5天内进行早期颈动脉内膜切除术,其结果与在更晚时间点进行颈动脉内膜切除术相当。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1719-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.101. Epub 2017 Aug 19.
4
A comparison of results of carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians and nonagenarians to younger patients from the Mid-America Vascular Study Group and the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.来自中美洲血管研究组和血管外科学会血管质量改进项目的一项针对八九十岁老人与年轻患者颈动脉内膜切除术结果的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jun;65(6):1643-1652. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.118. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
5
The impact of contralateral carotid artery stenosis on outcomes after carotid endarterectomy.对侧颈动脉狭窄对颈动脉内膜切除术预后的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1727-1734.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.032. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
6
Clinical and anatomic outcomes after carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术的临床和解剖学结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr;59(4):944-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.10.059.
7
Carotid artery revascularization in patients with contralateral carotid artery occlusion: Stent or endarterectomy?对侧颈动脉闭塞患者的颈动脉血运重建:支架置入术还是动脉内膜切除术?
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1735-1748.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.055. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
8
Carotid endarterectomy in female patients.女性患者的颈动脉内膜切除术。
J Vasc Surg. 2009 Dec;50(6):1301-6; discussion 1306-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.07.013. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
9
Carotid endarterectomy with concomitant distal endovascular intervention is associated with increased rates of stroke and death.颈动脉内膜切除术联合远端血管内介入治疗与更高的卒中发生率和死亡率相关。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Mar;73(3):960-967.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.07.062. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
10
Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with prior ipsilateral carotid artery stenting.既往同侧颈动脉支架置入患者行内膜切除术与支架置入术的比较
J Vasc Surg. 2017 May;65(5):1418-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.041. Epub 2017 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative Stroke.围手术期卒中。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020 Apr 27;20(5):12. doi: 10.1007/s11910-020-01033-7.
2
Perioperative stroke: pathophysiology and management.围手术期卒中:病理生理学与管理
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018 Feb;71(1):3-11. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2018.71.1.3. Epub 2018 Feb 1.