Suppr超能文献

质子泵抑制剂和组胺-2受体拮抗剂在儿童及青少年中的使用情况与安全性:一项观察性队列研究。

Utilization and safety of proton-pump inhibitors and histamine-2 receptor antagonists in children and adolescents: an observational cohort study.

作者信息

Ruigómez A, Johansson S, Nagy P, García Rodríguez L A

机构信息

a Spanish Centre for Pharmacoepidemiologic Research (CEIFE) , Madrid , Spain.

b AstraZeneca Gothenburg , Mölndal , Sweden.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Dec;33(12):2201-2209. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1354830. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the use of acid-suppressing treatments and related safety events in children.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared patient characteristics and safety outcomes among children prescribed acid-suppressing drugs for the first time.

METHODS

The Health Improvement Network was used to determine the characteristics of children prescribed a proton pump inhibitor (PPI; esomeprazole or another PPI) or a histamine-2 receptor antagonist (HRA) by UK primary care physicians between October 2009 and September 2012. Pre-defined safety outcomes were compared among the treatment groups in up to 18 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The cohorts comprised 8,172 patients on PPIs (including 24 patients on esomeprazole) and 7,905 on HRAs. The baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts, although the children in the PPI cohorts tended to be older. No safety outcomes occurred in the esomeprazole cohort. In the other-PPIs cohort, 92 safety outcomes occurred, most commonly gastroenteritis (n = 36; 39.1%). In the HRAs cohort, 193 safety outcomes occurred, most commonly gastroenteritis (n = 62; 32.1%). The incidence of most safety outcomes was higher in the HRAs cohort than in the other-PPIs cohort, including failure to thrive (3.11 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.25-4.28] vs 0.49 per 1,000 person-years [95% CI = 0.22-1.07]) and gastroenteritis (5.27 [95% CI = 4.11-6.75] vs 3.04 per 1,000 person-years [95% CI = 2.20-4.20]).

CONCLUSION

Esomeprazole is rarely prescribed to children when they first require acid-suppressing medication, compared with other PPIs/HRAs. Overall, more safety outcomes occurred in the HRAs cohort than in the PPI cohorts.

摘要

背景

关于儿童使用抑酸治疗及相关安全事件的情况知之甚少。

目的

本研究比较首次开具抑酸药物的儿童的患者特征和安全结局。

方法

利用健康改善网络确定2009年10月至2012年9月期间英国初级保健医生为儿童开具质子泵抑制剂(PPI;埃索美拉唑或其他PPI)或组胺-2受体拮抗剂(HRA)的特征。在长达18个月的随访中比较各治疗组之间预先定义的安全结局。

结果

队列包括8172例使用PPI的患者(包括24例使用埃索美拉唑的患者)和7905例使用HRA的患者。队列之间的基线特征相似,尽管PPI队列中的儿童往往年龄较大。埃索美拉唑队列中未发生安全结局。在其他PPI队列中,发生了92例安全结局,最常见的是胃肠炎(n = 36;39.1%)。在HRA队列中,发生了193例安全结局,最常见的是胃肠炎(n = 62;32.1%)。大多数安全结局的发生率在HRA队列中高于其他PPI队列,包括发育不良(每1000人年3.11 [95%置信区间(CI)= 2.25 - 4.28] 对比0.49 [95% CI = 0.22 - 1.07])和胃肠炎(每1000人年5.27 [95% CI = 4.11 - 6.75] 对比3.04 [95% CI = 2.20 - 4.20])。

结论

与其他PPI/HRA相比,儿童首次需要抑酸药物治疗时,埃索美拉唑的处方很少。总体而言,HRA队列中发生的安全结局比PPI队列更多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验