Lim EunJin, Vardy Janette L, Oh Byeongsang, Dhillon Haryana M
1 Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Concord Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney , NSW, Australia .
2 Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, Australia .
J Altern Complement Med. 2017 Dec;23(12):980-988. doi: 10.1089/acm.2016.0378. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
This study explored the models of services and experiences of coordinators and directors engaged in providing complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) or integrative medicine (IM) in oncology centers throughout Australia.
Fourteen leaders of IM programs from ten systematically selected Australian oncology centers were interviewed. Participants described their center's service model. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed to identify underlying themes. Results were merged using the matrix technique for triangulation.
Ten oncology centers were reviewed. IM was perceived in the context of supportive care and wellness. IM program types provided included the following: body-mind programs (56%); body-energy programs (23%), and body programs (21%). All programs were outpatient focused, generally did not require a doctors' referral, were freely accessible to cancer patients and carers at no or minimal cost, were centralized by coordinators, and involved volunteers, nurses, allied health practitioners, third parties, and patients in their treatment planning. Interaction between medical and CAM/IM teams was limited and tended to be informal. The underlying structure comprised four main themes: cultural context, human components, systematic components, and resource availability. Human components and resources were considered important in influencing cultural context and systematic components in the IM structure.
Australian integrative oncology models are based on the concept of wellness and individualized care, focused on patient empowerment and engagement. IM models are generally independent of conventional medical care. Building relationships and trust between stakeholders and open collaboration with conventional medical care will be important to integrate IM into the hospital system. Systemic changes to deliver patient centered care in the provision of IM healthcare will facilitate the incorporation of CAM and IM into cancer services in hospital settings.
本研究探讨了澳大利亚各地肿瘤中心从事补充和替代医学(CAM)或整合医学(IM)服务的协调员和主任的服务模式及经验。
对来自十个经系统挑选的澳大利亚肿瘤中心的14名整合医学项目负责人进行了访谈。参与者描述了他们中心的服务模式。对访谈记录进行了主题分析,以确定潜在主题。结果采用矩阵技术进行合并以进行三角验证。
对十个肿瘤中心进行了评估。整合医学在支持性护理和健康的背景下被看待。提供的整合医学项目类型包括:身心项目(56%);身体能量项目(23%),以及身体项目(21%)。所有项目都以门诊为重点,通常不需要医生转诊,癌症患者和护理人员可免费或以极低费用免费获得,由协调员集中管理,并让志愿者、护士、专职医疗人员、第三方和患者参与治疗计划。医学团队与补充和替代医学/整合医学团队之间的互动有限,且往往是非正式的。潜在结构包括四个主要主题:文化背景、人力因素、系统因素和资源可用性。人力因素和资源在影响整合医学结构中的文化背景和系统因素方面被认为很重要。
澳大利亚的综合肿瘤学模式基于健康和个性化护理的概念,侧重于患者赋权和参与。整合医学模式通常独立于传统医疗。在利益相关者之间建立关系和信任以及与传统医疗进行开放合作对于将整合医学纳入医院系统至关重要。在提供整合医学医疗服务时进行系统性变革以提供以患者为中心的护理将有助于将补充和替代医学及整合医学纳入医院环境中的癌症服务。