Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas St, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Department of Neuro-Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
J Neurooncol. 2017 Oct;135(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s11060-017-2550-5. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
Treatment response and survival after bevacizumab failure remains poor in patients with glioblastoma. Several recent publications examining glioblastoma patients treated with bevacizumab have described specific radiographic patterns of disease progression as correlating with outcome. This study aims to scrutinize these previously reported radiographic prognostic models in an independent data set to inspect their reproducibility and potential for clinical utility. Sixty four patients treated at MD Anderson matched predetermined inclusion criteria. Patients were categorized based on previously published data by: (1) Nowosielski et al. into: T2-diffuse, cT1 Flare-up, non-responders and T2 circumscribed groups (2) Modified Pope et al. criteria into: local, diffuse and distant groups and (3) Bahr et al. into groups with or without new diffusion-restricted and/or pre-contrast T1-hyperintense lesions. When classified according to Nowosielski et al. criteria, the cT1 Flare-up group had the longest overall survival (OS) from bevacizumab initiation, with non-responders having the worst outcomes. The T2 diffuse group had the longest progression free survival (PFS) from start of bevacizumab. When classified by modified Pope at al. criteria, most patients did not experience a shift in tumor pattern from the pattern at baseline, while the PFS and OS in patients with local-to-local and local-to-diffuse/distant patterns of progression were similar. Patients developing restricted diffusion on bevacizumab had worse OS. Diffuse patterns of progression in patients treated with bevacizumab are rare and not associated with worse outcomes compared to other radiographic subgroups. Emergence of restricted diffusion during bevacizumab treatment was a radiographic marker of worse OS.
贝伐单抗治疗失败后胶质母细胞瘤患者的治疗反应和生存仍然很差。最近有几项研究检查了接受贝伐单抗治疗的胶质母细胞瘤患者,描述了与结果相关的特定疾病进展的影像学模式。本研究旨在对独立数据集进行分析,以检查这些先前报道的影像学预后模型的可重复性和临床实用性。在 MD 安德森癌症中心治疗的 64 名患者符合预定的纳入标准。根据先前发表的数据,患者分为以下几类:(1)Nowosielski 等人:T2 弥漫性、cT1 爆发性、无反应性和 T2 局限性;(2)改良 Pope 等人:局部、弥漫性和远处;(3)Bahr 等人:有无新的弥散受限和/或增强前 T1 高信号病变。根据 Nowosielski 等人的标准分类,cT1 爆发组从贝伐单抗开始的总生存期最长,无反应组的预后最差。T2 弥漫组从贝伐单抗开始的无进展生存期最长。根据改良 Pope 等人的标准分类,大多数患者的肿瘤模式没有从基线模式发生变化,而局部到局部和局部到弥漫/远处进展的患者的无进展生存期和总生存期相似。在贝伐单抗治疗中出现弥散受限的患者的总生存期更差。与其他影像学亚组相比,接受贝伐单抗治疗的患者中弥漫性进展模式很少见,与更差的结局无关。贝伐单抗治疗期间出现弥散受限是总生存期较差的影像学标志物。