Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, The University of Hong Kong, 3/F, Ap Lei Chau Clinic, 161 Ap Lei Chau Main Street, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong.
Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, UK.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2018 Feb;16(1):5-14. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0339-5.
The aim of this article is to describe the process, evaluation criteria, and possible outcomes of decision-making for new drugs listed in the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Drug Formulary in comparison to the health technology assessment (HTA) policy overseas. Details of decision-making processes including the new drug listing submission, Drug Advisory Committee (DAC) meeting, and procedures prior to and following the meeting, were extracted from the official Hong Kong Hospital Authority drug formulary management website and manual. Publicly-available information related to the new drug decision-making process for five HTA agencies [the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC), the Australia Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC), the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), and the New Zealand Pharmaceutical Management Agency (PHARMAC)] were reviewed and retrieved from official documents from public domains. The DAC is in charge of systemically and critically appraising new drugs before they are listed on the formulary, reviewing submitted applications, and making the decision to list the drug based on scientific evidence to which safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness are the primary considerations. When compared with other HTA agencies, transparency of the decision-making process of the DAC, the relevance of clinical and health economic evidence, and the lack of health economic and methodological input of submissions are the major challenges to the new-drug listing policy in Hong Kong. Despite these challenges, this review provides suggestions for the establishment of a more transparent, credible, and evidence-based decision-making process in the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Drug Formulary. Proposals for improvement in the listing of new drugs in the formulary should be a priority of healthcare reforms.
本文旨在描述在香港医院管理局药物名册中列出新药的决策过程、评估标准和可能结果,并将其与海外的卫生技术评估 (HTA) 政策进行比较。从香港医院管理局药物名册管理网站和手册中提取了决策过程的详细信息,包括新药上市申请、药物咨询委员会 (DAC) 会议以及会议前后的程序。还从公开领域的官方文件中检索并审查了五个 HTA 机构(英国国家卫生与保健优化研究所 (NICE)、苏格兰药品联合咨询委员会 (SMC)、澳大利亚药品福利咨询委员会 (PBAC)、加拿大药品和技术评估机构 (CADTH) 和新西兰药品管理局 (PHARMAC))的新药决策过程的相关信息。DAC 负责在新药列入名册前对其进行系统和严格的评估,审查提交的申请,并根据安全性、疗效和成本效益作为主要考虑因素的科学证据做出列入药物的决定。与其他 HTA 机构相比,DAC 决策过程的透明度、临床和健康经济证据的相关性以及提交材料中缺乏健康经济和方法学投入是香港新药上市政策面临的主要挑战。尽管存在这些挑战,但本次审查为香港医院管理局药物名册建立更透明、可信和基于证据的决策过程提供了建议。改进药物名册中新药上市的建议应成为医疗改革的优先事项。