Suppr超能文献

身体成分对运动后水疗生理反应的影响。

Influence of body composition on physiological responses to post-exercise hydrotherapy.

作者信息

Stephens Jessica M, Halson Shona L, Miller Joanna, Slater Gary J, Askew Christopher D

机构信息

a Department of Physiology , Australian Institute of Sport , Bruce , ACT , Australia.

b School of Health and Sport Sciences , University of the Sunshine Coast , Maroochydore , QLD , Australia.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2018 May;36(9):1044-1053. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1355062. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

Abstract

This study examined the influence of body composition on temperature and blood flow responses to post-exercise cold water immersion (CWI), hot water immersion (HWI) and control (CON). Twenty-seven male participants were stratified into three groups: 1) low mass and low fat (LM-LF); 2) high mass and low fat (HM-LF); or 3) high mass and high fat (HM-HF). Experimental trials involved a standardised bout of cycling, maintained until core temperature reached 38.5°C. Participants subsequently completed one of three 15-min recovery interventions (CWI, HWI, or CON). Core, skin and muscle temperatures, and limb blood flow were recorded at baseline, post-exercise, and every 30 min following recovery for 240 min. During CON and HWI there were no differences in core or muscle temperature between body composition groups. The rate of fall in core temperature following CWI was greater in the LM-LF (0.03 ± 0.01°C/min) group compared to the HM-HF (0.01 ± 0.001°C/min) group (P = 0.002). Muscle temperature decreased to a greater extent during CWI in the LM-LF and HM-LF groups (8.6 ± 3.0°C) compared with HM-HF (5.1 ± 2.0°C, P < 0.05). Blood flow responses did not differ between groups. Differences in body composition alter the thermal response to post-exercise CWI, which may explain some of the variance in the responses to CWI recovery.

摘要

本研究考察了身体成分对运动后冷水浸泡(CWI)、热水浸泡(HWI)及对照组(CON)的体温和血流反应的影响。27名男性参与者被分为三组:1)低体重低脂肪(LM-LF)组;2)高体重低脂肪(HM-LF)组;3)高体重高脂肪(HM-HF)组。实验包括一次标准化的骑行运动,持续至核心体温达到38.5°C。随后,参与者完成三种15分钟恢复干预措施之一(CWI、HWI或CON)。在基线、运动后以及恢复后的240分钟内,每30分钟记录一次核心温度、皮肤温度、肌肉温度和肢体血流。在CON和HWI期间,身体成分组之间的核心温度或肌肉温度没有差异。与HM-HF组(0.01±0.001°C/分钟)相比,LM-LF组(0.03±0.01°C/分钟)在CWI后核心温度下降速率更快(P = 0.002)。与HM-HF组(5.1±2.0°C,P < 0.05)相比,LM-LF组和HM-LF组在CWI期间肌肉温度下降幅度更大(8.6±3.0°C)。各组之间的血流反应没有差异。身体成分的差异改变了运动后CWI的热反应,这可能解释了CWI恢复反应中一些差异的原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验