Stephens Jessica M, Halson Shona L, Miller Joanna, Slater Gary J, Askew Christopher D
a Department of Physiology , Australian Institute of Sport , Bruce , ACT , Australia.
b School of Health and Sport Sciences , University of the Sunshine Coast , Maroochydore , QLD , Australia.
J Sports Sci. 2018 May;36(9):1044-1053. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1355062. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
This study examined the influence of body composition on temperature and blood flow responses to post-exercise cold water immersion (CWI), hot water immersion (HWI) and control (CON). Twenty-seven male participants were stratified into three groups: 1) low mass and low fat (LM-LF); 2) high mass and low fat (HM-LF); or 3) high mass and high fat (HM-HF). Experimental trials involved a standardised bout of cycling, maintained until core temperature reached 38.5°C. Participants subsequently completed one of three 15-min recovery interventions (CWI, HWI, or CON). Core, skin and muscle temperatures, and limb blood flow were recorded at baseline, post-exercise, and every 30 min following recovery for 240 min. During CON and HWI there were no differences in core or muscle temperature between body composition groups. The rate of fall in core temperature following CWI was greater in the LM-LF (0.03 ± 0.01°C/min) group compared to the HM-HF (0.01 ± 0.001°C/min) group (P = 0.002). Muscle temperature decreased to a greater extent during CWI in the LM-LF and HM-LF groups (8.6 ± 3.0°C) compared with HM-HF (5.1 ± 2.0°C, P < 0.05). Blood flow responses did not differ between groups. Differences in body composition alter the thermal response to post-exercise CWI, which may explain some of the variance in the responses to CWI recovery.
本研究考察了身体成分对运动后冷水浸泡(CWI)、热水浸泡(HWI)及对照组(CON)的体温和血流反应的影响。27名男性参与者被分为三组:1)低体重低脂肪(LM-LF)组;2)高体重低脂肪(HM-LF)组;3)高体重高脂肪(HM-HF)组。实验包括一次标准化的骑行运动,持续至核心体温达到38.5°C。随后,参与者完成三种15分钟恢复干预措施之一(CWI、HWI或CON)。在基线、运动后以及恢复后的240分钟内,每30分钟记录一次核心温度、皮肤温度、肌肉温度和肢体血流。在CON和HWI期间,身体成分组之间的核心温度或肌肉温度没有差异。与HM-HF组(0.01±0.001°C/分钟)相比,LM-LF组(0.03±0.01°C/分钟)在CWI后核心温度下降速率更快(P = 0.002)。与HM-HF组(5.1±2.0°C,P < 0.05)相比,LM-LF组和HM-LF组在CWI期间肌肉温度下降幅度更大(8.6±3.0°C)。各组之间的血流反应没有差异。身体成分的差异改变了运动后CWI的热反应,这可能解释了CWI恢复反应中一些差异的原因。