• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验室间HER2检测的比较:我们在两年内对在莫菲特癌症中心重新检测的复查病例的经验。

Comparison of HER2 testing among laboratories: Our experience with review cases retested at Moffitt Cancer Center in a two-year period.

作者信息

Rosa Marilin, Khazai Laila

机构信息

Department of Anatomic Pathology and Comprehensive Breast Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

Breast J. 2018 Mar;24(2):139-147. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12858. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1111/tbj.12858
PMID:28703376
Abstract

Determination of human epidermal receptor protein-2 (HER2) is a crucial step in the treatment of patients diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma. HER2 status is an independent clinical prognostic factor and a predictive factor of tumor response to chemotherapeutic agents such as trastuzumab. Accurate testing is necessary to offer adequate therapy to patients. To evaluate the variation in HER2 testing results, we analyzed our data from review cases in which HER2 testing was repeated at our institution from January 2013 to December 2014. For the study, the reason for repeating the test, the testing methodology used, and the tests results were collected. Concordance between outside and in-house HER2 results was compared. Discrepancies were classified as major and minor. A total of 173 cases were retested during this period. One-hundred and twenty-eight cases met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen cases were originally tested at large reference laboratories and two in international laboratories. In the 110 remaining cases, the test was performed at small community laboratories or the testing facility was not available. Forty-one (32%) discrepancies were identified. Of these, 15 (12% of 128 total) were major and 26 (20% of 128 total) were considered minor discrepancies. Our study confirms that significant discrepancies in HER2 results persist even after stricter and well-developed testing guidelines have been embraced.

摘要

人表皮受体蛋白2(HER2)的检测是确诊为浸润性乳腺癌患者治疗过程中的关键步骤。HER2状态是一个独立的临床预后因素,也是肿瘤对诸如曲妥珠单抗等化疗药物反应的预测因素。准确检测对于为患者提供适当治疗至关重要。为了评估HER2检测结果的差异,我们分析了2013年1月至2014年12月在我院重复进行HER2检测的回顾性病例数据。对于该研究,收集了重复检测的原因、所使用的检测方法以及检测结果。比较了外部与内部HER2检测结果之间的一致性。将差异分为主要差异和次要差异。在此期间共对173例病例进行了重新检测。128例病例符合纳入标准。16例最初在大型参考实验室进行检测,2例在国际实验室进行检测。其余110例病例在小型社区实验室进行检测或检测机构不可用。共发现41例(32%)差异。其中,15例(占总数128例的12%)为主要差异,26例(占总数128例的20%)为次要差异。我们的研究证实,即使采用了更严格且完善的检测指南,HER2检测结果仍存在显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of HER2 testing among laboratories: Our experience with review cases retested at Moffitt Cancer Center in a two-year period.实验室间HER2检测的比较:我们在两年内对在莫菲特癌症中心重新检测的复查病例的经验。
Breast J. 2018 Mar;24(2):139-147. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12858. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
2
Correlation of HER2 overexpression with gene amplification and its relation to chromosome 17 aneuploidy: a 5-year experience with invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas.HER2过表达与基因扩增的相关性及其与17号染色体非整倍体的关系:5年浸润性导管癌和小叶癌的经验
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014 Aug 15;7(9):6254-61. eCollection 2014.
3
Prognostic value of phosphorylated HER2 in HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant trastuzumab.磷酸化HER2在接受辅助曲妥珠单抗治疗的HER2阳性乳腺癌患者中的预后价值。
Breast Cancer. 2015 May;22(3):292-9. doi: 10.1007/s12282-013-0478-y. Epub 2013 Jun 8.
4
HER2 testing in breast carcinoma: very low concordance rate between reference and local laboratories in Brazil.乳腺癌中的HER2检测:巴西参考实验室与当地实验室之间的一致性率极低。
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2011 Mar;19(2):112-8. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e3181f0b044.
5
Comparison of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 results in concurrent ipsilateral samples with invasive breast carcinoma: a retrospective study of 246 biopsies from 119 patients.浸润性乳腺癌同侧同步样本中雌激素受体、孕激素受体及人表皮生长因子受体2检测结果的比较:一项对119例患者的246份活检样本的回顾性研究
Hum Pathol. 2017 Jul;65:123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
6
Impact of 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 determination of invasive breast cancer: A single institution experience using frontline dual-color FISH.2013年美国临床肿瘤学会/美国病理学家学会指南对浸润性乳腺癌HER2检测的影响:一项使用一线双色荧光原位杂交技术的单机构经验
Breast. 2017 Aug;34:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 15.
7
Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancer phenotype, ER/PR and HER2 expression - Implications for the practising oncologist.新辅助化疗对乳腺癌表型、雌激素受体/孕激素受体及人表皮生长因子受体2表达的影响——对肿瘤专科医生的启示
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jun;60:40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.006. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
8
Basal-like immunophenotype markers and prognosis in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌的基底样免疫表型标志物与预后
Tumori. 2010 Nov-Dec;96(6):966-70.
9
Breast cancer biomarkers before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: does repeat testing impact therapeutic management?新辅助化疗前后的乳腺癌生物标志物:重复检测是否会影响治疗管理?
Hum Pathol. 2017 Apr;62:215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.12.019. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
10
Concordance between central and local laboratory HER2 testing from a community-based clinical study.一项基于社区的临床研究中中心实验室与当地实验室HER2检测结果的一致性
Clin Breast Cancer. 2006 Jun;7(2):153-7. doi: 10.3816/CBC.2006.n.025.

引用本文的文献

1
The Performance and Clinical Applicability of HER2 Digital Image Analysis in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.HER2数字图像分析在乳腺癌中的性能及临床适用性:一项系统综述
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 3;16(15):2761. doi: 10.3390/cancers16152761.
2
Suboptimal concordance in testing and retesting results of triple-negative breast carcinoma cases among laboratories: one institution experience.各实验室三阴乳腺癌病例检测与重新检测结果的一致性欠佳:某机构的经验
Cancer Cell Int. 2019 Oct 11;19:263. doi: 10.1186/s12935-019-0987-7. eCollection 2019.
3
Hormone- and HER2-receptor assessment in 33,046 breast cancer patients: a nationwide comparison of positivity rates between pathology laboratories in the Netherlands.
33046 例乳腺癌患者的激素和 HER2 受体检测:荷兰各病理实验室间阳性率的全国性比较。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Jun;175(2):487-497. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05180-5. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
4
A Root Cause Analysis Into the High Error Rate in Clinical Immunohistochemistry.临床免疫组织化学高错误率的根本原因分析
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2019 May/Jun;27(5):329-338. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000750.