Viersprong Institute for Studies on Personality Disorders (VISPD), Halsteren, the Netherlands.
Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Section of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Personal Ment Health. 2017 Nov;11(4):266-277. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1381. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
The quality of implementation of evidence-based treatment programs for borderline personality disorder (BPD) in routine clinical care is a neglected issue. The first aim of this mixed-method naturalistic study was to explore the impact of organizational changes on treatment effectiveness of a day-hospital programme of mentalization-based treatment. Consecutively referred BPD patients were divided into a pre-reorganization cohort (PRE-REORG) and a cohort during reorganization (REORG). Psychiatric symptoms (Brief Symptom Inventory) and personality functioning (Severity Indices of Personality Problems-118) before treatment and at 18- and 36-month follow-up were compared using multilevel modelling. Effect sizes in the PRE-REORG cohort were approximately twice as large at 18 months (PRE-REORG: range 0.81-1.22; REORG: range 0.03-0.71) and three times as large at 36 months (PRE-REORG: range 0.81-1.80; REORG: range 0.27-0.81). The quantitative results of this study suggest that even when mentalization-based treatment is successfully implemented and the structure of the programme remains intact, major organizational changes may have a considerable impact on its effectiveness. Second, we aimed to explore the impact of the reorganization on adherence at organizational, team and therapist level. The qualitative results of this study indicate that the organizational changes were negatively related to adherence to the treatment model at organizational, team and therapist level, which in turn was associated with a decrease in treatment effectiveness. The implications of these findings for the implementation of effective treatments for BPD in routine clinical practice are discussed. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
在常规临床护理中实施基于证据的边缘型人格障碍 (BPD) 治疗方案的质量是一个被忽视的问题。本混合方法自然主义研究的首要目的是探讨组织变革对精神分析治疗为基础的日医院治疗方案治疗效果的影响。连续转介的 BPD 患者被分为预组织变革队列 (PRE-REORG) 和组织变革期间队列 (REORG)。使用多层次模型比较治疗前和 18 个月和 36 个月随访时的精神症状 (Brief Symptom Inventory) 和人格功能 (118 项人格问题严重程度指数)。PRE-REORG 队列的效应大小在 18 个月时约为两倍 (PRE-REORG:范围 0.81-1.22;REORG:范围 0.03-0.71),在 36 个月时约为三倍 (PRE-REORG:范围 0.81-1.80;REORG:范围 0.27-0.81)。这项研究的定量结果表明,即使精神分析治疗成功实施且方案结构保持完整,重大组织变革也可能对其有效性产生重大影响。其次,我们旨在探讨组织变革对组织、团队和治疗师层面的依从性的影响。这项研究的定性结果表明,组织变革与组织、团队和治疗师层面的治疗模式依从性呈负相关,这反过来又与治疗效果下降有关。这些发现对边缘型人格障碍在常规临床实践中实施有效治疗的意义进行了讨论。版权所有 © 2017 约翰威利父子有限公司。